Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238932›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of History of Spontaneous or Induced Abortion With Subsequent Risk of Gestational Diabetes.

Yan Zhao, Yongbo Zhao, Kechen Fan, Liping Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yongbo ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Kechen FanShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Liping JinShanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceGestational diabetes (GD) is one of the most common and important complications of pregnancy. Identifying pregnant women who are at high risk of GD is crucial for implementing early prevention and intervention.

objectiveTo examine whether a history of spontaneous abortion (SAB) or induced abortion is associated with increased risk of GD in subsequent pregnancies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. Pregnant women who received routine antenatal care between January 2014 and December 2019 were included. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to June 2021. EXPOSURES: Maternal history of abortion, including SAB and induced abortion, were extracted from medical records. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: GD was diagnosed with a 75-g diagnostic oral glucose tolerance test. A multivariable-adjusted log-binomial analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs of GD associated with history of abortion.

resultsAmong the 102 259 included pregnant women (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [3.8] years), 14 579 (14.3%) experienced only SAB, 17 935 (17.5%) experienced only induced abortion, and 4017 (3.9%) experienced both SAB and induced abortion. A total of 12 153 GD cases were identified, and the prevalence of GD was 11.9% (12 153 of 102 259 women) in this cohort. Pregnant women who experienced only SAB (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18-1.31) or both SAB and induced abortion (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27) were at higher risk of developing GD. The association of SAB history with GD occurred in a number-dependent manner. Compared with pregnant women with no history of abortion, the RR for GD increased by 18% (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.26) for pregnant women with 1 SAB, by 41% (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.27-1.57) for those with 2 SABs, and by 43% (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.67) for those more than 2 SABs. However, no association between history of induced abortion and GD was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that a history of SAB was associated with increased risk of GD in subsequent pregnancies. Further research is needed to clarify this association and explore the potential biological mechanisms underlying the association.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousDiabetes, GestationalAdultChinaFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35238932
PMCPMC8895257
OpenAlexW4214836307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.