Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238787›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2022

Evidence-Based Behavioral Strategies in Smartphone Apps for Children's Sleep: Content Analysis.

Stacey L Simon, Jill L Kaar, Ishaah Talker, Jennifer Reich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey L SimonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-8151
Jill L KaarDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-7476
Ishaah TalkerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3201-5023
Jennifer ReichDepartment of Sociology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-8618
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus DRCP30DK116073 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LORI SUSSEL · 2020 to 2026
$10.8M
Impact of Sleep Extension on Insulin Sensitivity and Dietary Intake in AdolescentsK23DK117021 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SIMON, STACEY LYNN · 2018 to 2021
$682k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117021NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK116073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpirically supported treatments for pediatric sleep problems exist, but many families turn to other sources for help with their children's sleep, such as smartphone apps. Sleep apps are easy for families to access, but little evidence exists regarding the validity of the services and information provided in the developer descriptions of the apps.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to examine the features and claims of developer descriptions of sleep apps for children.

methodsA search of the Apple iTunes store and Google Play was conducted using the terms "kids sleep," "child sleep," and "baby sleep." Data on the type of app, price, user rating, and number of users were collected. Apps were analyzed in comparison with evidence-based behavioral strategies and were thematically coded on the basis of claims provided in developer descriptions.

resultsA total of 83 app descriptions were examined, of which only 2 (2.4%) offered sleep improvement strategies. The majority were sound and light apps (78%) and 19% were bedtime games or stories. Only 18 of 83 (21.6%) apps were identified as containing empirically supported behavioral sleep strategies. Despite this, many apps asserted claims that they will help children "fall asleep instantly," "cry less and sleep better," or improve child development.

conclusionsA large variety of sleep apps exist for use among children, but few include evidence-based behavioral strategies according to the developer descriptions of the apps. Addressing sleep difficulties in children is important to promote physical, cognitive, and emotional development. Collaboration between sleep researchers and technology developers may be beneficial for creating evidence-supported apps to help with children's sleep in the future.

Indexed as

appschildrendeveloper descriptionshealth applicationshealth behaviormHealthmobile healthpediatricssleep applicationssleep disorderssleep problemssmartphone applicationssmartphonestechnology

Identifiers

PMID35238787
PMCPMC8931643
OpenAlexW4214906749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.