Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238786›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2022

Learning Analytics Applied to Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Using a Natural Language Processing-Based Virtual Patient Simulator: Case Study.

Raffaello Furlan, Mauro Gatti, Roberto Mene, Dana Shiffer, Chiara Marchiori, Alessandro Giaj Levra, Vincenzo Saturnino, Enrico Brunetta, Franca Dipaola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raffaello Furlan *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5209-6786
Mauro Gatti *IBM, Active Intelligence Center, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4312-8835
Roberto MeneDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-1977
Dana ShifferDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-6899
Chiara MarchioriIBM Research, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-2863
Alessandro Giaj LevraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7779-5276
Vincenzo SaturninoIBM, Active Intelligence Center, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-5651
Enrico BrunettaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0676-1228
Franca DipaolaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-8935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual patient simulators (VPSs) log all users' actions, thereby enabling the creation of a multidimensional representation of students' medical knowledge. This representation can be used to create metrics providing teachers with valuable learning information.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to describe the metrics we developed to analyze the clinical diagnostic reasoning of medical students, provide examples of their application, and preliminarily validate these metrics on a class of undergraduate medical students. The metrics are computed from the data obtained through a novel VPS embedding natural language processing techniques.

methodsA total of 2 clinical case simulations (tests) were created to test our metrics. During each simulation, the students' step-by-step actions were logged into the program database for offline analysis. The students' performance was divided into seven dimensions: the identification of relevant information in the given clinical scenario, history taking, physical examination, medical test ordering, diagnostic hypothesis setting, binary analysis fulfillment, and final diagnosis setting. Sensitivity (percentage of relevant information found) and precision (percentage of correct actions performed) metrics were computed for each issue and combined into a harmonic mean (F

resultsThe mean overall scores were consistent between test 1 (mean 0.59, SD 0.05) and test 2 (mean 0.54, SD 0.12). For each student, the overall performance was achieved through a different contribution in collecting and analyzing information. Methodological scores highlighted discordances between the reference diagnostic pattern previously set by the teacher and the one pursued by the student. No significant correlation was found between the VPS scores and hematology examination scores.

conclusionsDifferent components of the students' diagnostic process may be disentangled and quantified by appropriate metrics applied to students' actions recorded while addressing a virtual case. Such an approach may help teachers provide students with individualized feedback aimed at filling competence drawbacks and methodological inconsistencies. There was no correlation between the hematology curricular examination score and any of the proposed scores as these scores address different aspects of students' medical knowledge.

Indexed as

clinical diagnostic reasoninglearning analyticsmedical educationmedical knowledgenatural language processingvirtual patient simulator

Identifiers

PMID35238786
PMCPMC8931645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.