Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238668›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

CO

Chi Chen, William J Riley, I Colin Prentice, Trevor F Keenan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Increasing CONature · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rising atmospheric COFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Escalating drought sensitivity of a greening China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  8. Amazon forest faces severe decline under the dual pressures of anthropogenic climate change and land-use change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Water-use efficiency driven by water savings.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
  15. Observed declines in leaf nitrogen explained by photosynthetic acclimation to COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Nonnative tree invaders lead to declines in native tree species richness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi ChenClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-4079
William J RileyClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-2304
I Colin PrenticeDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Trevor F KeenanClimate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USImperial College London · GB

Funding

Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC18K1705Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC19K1705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceThe magnitude of the CO

Indexed as

carbon and water couplingCO2 fertilization effectGPPoptimization theoryphotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID35238668
PMCPMC8915860
OpenAlexW4214861785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.