ArticleBrain and behavior2022
Factors affecting transtemporal window quality in transcranial sonography.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating progressive supranuclear palsy from other movement disorders using transcranial sonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Pooled it
- Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound amygdala neuromodulation: a double-blind sham-controlled target engagement study and unblinded single-arm clinical trial.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Temporal Acoustic-Window Failure in Female Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Eight-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bedside transcranial Doppler as a diagnostic bridge for suspected intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury surgery: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Region-specific associations between cerebral arterial elasticity and grey matter volume: Evidence for lateral prefrontal vulnerability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Robotic Assisted Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Acute Neurovascular Care: A Feasibility and Safety Study.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of a prediction model for facilitating the clinical application of transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Quantitative regional cerebral blood flow measurement using near-infrared spectroscopy and indocyanine green in patients undergoing superficial temporal to middle cerebral artery bypass for moyamoya disease: a novel method using a frequency filter.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Article
- Factors affecting transtemporal window quality in transcranial sonography.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the influencing factors of transtemporal window quality and identify patients suitable for transcranial sonography (TCS) examination in two-dimensional imaging.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, TCS was performed in 161 consecutive patients through the temporal bone window (TBW) in the neurology or neurosurgery department. Each patient's sex, age, height, weight, and temporal bone thickness (TBT) were collected. After examination, the patients were divided into two groups: TBW success and TBW failure. The data were statistically compared between the two groups.
resultsAmong the studied population, the total TBW success rate was 80.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74-86). The TBW success rate was 91.4% (95% CI: 85-98) in males and 70.9% (95% CI: 61-81) in females (p = .001). Sex (p = .001), age (p = .002), height (p = .047), and TBT (p < .001) showed significant differences between the TBW success and failure groups. In males, only TBT (p = .001) showed a significant difference; in females, age (p < .001) and TBT (p = .003) showed a significant difference. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of sex, age, and TBT and their combination was 0.686, 0.659, 0.842, and 0.922 (p < .001), respectively. The AUC of the combination of parameters was significantly greater than that of age and sex alone (p = .007; p = .0002) but not greater than that of TBT (p = .090).
conclusionsThe TBW success rate varied with sex, age, height, and TBT. Males, younger patients, taller patients, and patients with a thinner temporal bone tended to be more suitable for the examination by TCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.