Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238397›Full record

Trial reportHealth services research2022

Impact of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model on patient-reported outcomes.

Matthew J Trombley, Rayan Joneydi, Louisa A Buatti, Karen L Schneider, Colleen M Kummet, Ian Morrall

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew J TrombleyDivision of Health and Environment, Abt Associates, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5089-9745
Rayan JoneydiDivision of Health and Environment, Abt Associates, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Louisa A BuattiDivision of Health and Environment, Abt Associates, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Karen L SchneiderThe Lewin Group, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Colleen M KummetFederal Civilian Division, General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT), West Des Moines, Iowa, USA.
Ian MorrallThe Lewin Group, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, a mandatory episode-based payment program for knee and hip replacement surgery, affected patient-reported measures of quality. DATA SOURCES: Surveys of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who had hip or knee replacement surgery, collected between July 2018 and March 2019, secondary Medicare administrative data, the Provider of Services file, CJR and Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participant lists from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and the Area Health Resource Files. STUDY

designIn 2018, participation in the CJR model was mandatory for nearly all hospitals in 34 randomly selected, metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) that had high historical Medicare payments for lower-extremity joint replacements surgery. The control group included 47 high-payment MSAs randomly assigned as controls. We estimated risk-adjusted differences in self-reported measures of functional status and pain, satisfaction with care, and caregiver help between respondents in CJR hospitals and respondents in hospitals located in the control group. DATA COLLECTION: We selected a census of CJR patients and an equal number of control patients to survey. We fielded two waves of surveys using a mail and phone protocol, yielding 8433 CJR and 9014 control respondents. PRINCIPAL

findingsCJR respondents were slightly more likely to depend on caregivers for certain activities of daily living when they got home (either directly from the hospital or after an institutional post-acute care stay). On a 100-point scale, differences ranged from -2.6 points (p < 0.01) for help needed bathing to -1.7 points (p < 0.05) for help needed using the toilet. However, differences in eight measures of self-reported functional status approximately 90-120 days after hospital discharge were not statistically significant, ranging from -1.1% (p = 0.087) to 0.7% (p = 0.437).

conclusionsCJR did not harm patient health or affect patient satisfaction on average but did increase reliance on caregivers during recovery.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeActivities of Daily LivingAgedHumansMedicarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReimbursement MechanismsUnited Stateshealth policy/politics/law/regulationincentives in health caremedicarepatient assessment/satisfactionpatient outcomes/functional status/ADLs/IADLsquality of care/patient safety (measurement)

Identifiers

PMID35238397
PMCPMC9441280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.