Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35238358›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2021

Factors Predicting Blood Culture Positivity in Children With Enteric Fever.

Manikandan Srinivasan, Kulandaipalayam Natarajan Sindhu, Karthikeyan Ramanujam, Ranjith Kumar Ramasamy, Sathyapriya Subramaniam, Santhosh Kumar Ganesan, Swathi Vajja, Anita Shirley David, Pramitha Lankala, Winsley Rose and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Burden of Typhoid and Paratyphoid Fever in India.The New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Typhoid in India: An Age-old Problem With an Existing Solution.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Manikandan SrinivasanDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Kulandaipalayam Natarajan SindhuDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Karthikeyan RamanujamDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Ranjith Kumar RamasamyDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Sathyapriya SubramaniamDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Santhosh Kumar GanesanDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Swathi VajjaDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Anita Shirley DavidDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Pramitha LankalaDepartment of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Winsley RoseWellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Prabhakar D MosesDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Nicholas C GrasslyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gagandeep KangDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3656-564X
Jacob JohnDepartment of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-5099

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood culture, despite low sensitivity, is the gold standard for enteric fever diagnosis. Understanding predictors of blood culture positivity may help design strategies to optimize enteric fever diagnosis.

methodsA cohort of 6760 children aged 0.5-15 years was followed for 3 years for enteric fever with blood cultures in an automated system, for fevers >3 days. Factors affecting test positivity in fevers and participant-level predictors for culture refusals were analyzed using regression models.

resultsOverall, 6097 suspected typhoid/paratyphoid fever (STF) episodes were reported, of which 5703 (93.5%) STFs had sampling for blood cultures, with 394 (6.5%) refusals. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi/Paratyphi positivity was culture-confirmed in 3.8% (218/5703) of STF episodes. Older children (odds ratio [OR], 1.96 [95% CI, 1.39-2.77]), larger blood volume inoculated (OR, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.71-4.66]), higher temperatures during fever (OR, 3.77 [95% CI, 2.89-4.91]), and fevers diagnosed as suspected typhoid or acute undifferentiated fever (OR, 6.06 [95% CI, 3.11-11.78]) had a higher probability of culture positivity. Antibiotics before culture did not decrease culture positivity. Blood culture refusals were higher for children from wealthier households or with milder illness.

conclusionsPerforming blood cultures in older children with fever, especially those fevers with toxic presentation and increasing blood volume for inoculation are strategies to improve enteric fever detection in surveillance settings.

Indexed as

Typhoid FeverAdolescentBlood CultureChildFeverHumansSalmonella paratyphi ASalmonella typhiblood culturechildrenenteric feverIndiaSalmonella Typhi

Identifiers

PMID35238358
PMCPMC8892536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.