ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022
Dynamics of cortical and corticomuscular connectivity during planning and execution of visually guided steps in humans.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Wearable MEG to Study the Neural Control of Human Stepping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable MEG data recorded during human stepping.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Electrophysiological Approaches to Understanding Brain-Muscle Interactions During Gait: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Corticomuscular and intermuscular coherence during evidence accumulation in sensorimotor decision-making.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Intramuscular coherence during challenging walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: Reduced high-frequency coherence reflects impaired supra-spinal control.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The cortical mechanisms underlying the act of taking a step-including planning, execution, and modification-are not well understood. We hypothesized that oscillatory communication in a parieto-frontal and corticomuscular network is involved in the neural control of visually guided steps. We addressed this hypothesis using source reconstruction and lagged coherence analysis of electroencephalographic and electromyographic recordings during visually guided stepping and 2 control tasks that aimed to investigate processes involved in (i) preparing and taking a step and (ii) adjusting a step based on visual information. Steps were divided into planning, initiation, and execution phases. Taking a step was characterized by an upregulation of beta/gamma coherence within the parieto-frontal network during planning followed by a downregulation of alpha and beta/gamma coherence during initiation and execution. Step modification was characterized by bidirectional modulations of alpha and beta/gamma coherence in the parieto-frontal network during the phases leading up to step execution. Corticomuscular coherence did not exhibit task-related effects. We suggest that these task-related modulations indicate that the brain makes use of communication through coherence in the context of large-scale, whole-body movements, reflecting a process of flexibly fine-tuning inter-regional communication to achieve precision control during human stepping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.