ArticleAnimal genetics2022
The de novo assembly of a European wild boar genome revealed unique patterns of chromosomal structural variations and segmental duplications.
Article in Animal genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of two Chinese wild boars (Sus scrofa).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Positive selection on rare variants of IGF1R and BRD4 underlying the cold adaptation of wild boar.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Article
- Haplotype-resolved assembly of a pig genome using single-sperm sequencing.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Pig pangenome graph reveals functional features of non-reference sequences.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Haplotype-resolved assembly of the mule duck genome using high-fidelity sequencing technology.PloS one · 2024Article
- Origin, evolution, and tissue-specific functions of the porcine repetitive element 1.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- The de novo assembly of a European wild boar genome revealed unique patterns of chromosomal structural variations and segmental duplications.Animal genetics · 2022Article
- TheFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid progress of sequencing technology has greatly facilitated the de novo genome assembly of pig breeds. However, the assembly of the wild boar genome is still lacking, hampering our understanding of chromosomal and genomic evolution during domestication from wild boars into domestic pigs. Here, we sequenced and de novo assembled a European wild boar genome (ASM2165605v1) using the long-range information provided by 10× Linked-Reads sequencing. We achieved a high-quality assembly with contig N50 of 26.09 Mb. Additionally, 1.64% of the contigs (222) with lengths from 107.65 kb to 75.36 Mb covered 90.3% of the total genome size of ASM2165605v1 (~2.5 Gb). Mapping analysis revealed that the contigs can fill 24.73% (93/376) of the gaps present in the orthologous regions of the updated pig reference genome (Sscrofa11.1). We further improved the contigs into chromosome level with a reference-assistant scaffolding method. Using the 'assembly-to-assembly' approach, we identified intra-chromosomal large structural variations (SVs, length >1 kb) between ASM2165605v1 and Sscrofa11.1 assemblies. Interestingly, we found that the number of SV events on the X chromosome deviated significantly from the linear models fitting autosomes (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.