Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237901›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

A new approach for the acquisition of trauma surgical skills: an OSCE type of simulation training program.

Catalina Ortiz, Javier Vela, Caterina Contreras, Francisca Belmar, Ivan Paul, Analia Zinco, Juan Pablo Ramos, Pablo Ottolino, Pablo Achurra, Nicolas Jarufe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Catalina OrtizDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Javier VelaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Caterina ContrerasDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Francisca BelmarDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Ivan PaulDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Analia ZincoTrauma Surgery Department, Hospital Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile.
Juan Pablo RamosTrauma Surgery Department, Hospital Sótero del Río, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo OttolinoExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo AchurraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Nicolas JarufeDepartment of Surgery, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Adnan AlseidiDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Julian VarasDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. jevaras@uc.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-9937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, trauma-related deaths are one of the main causes of mortality. Appropriate surgical treatment is crucial to prevent mortality, however, in the past decade, general surgery residents' exposure to trauma cases has decreased, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, accessible simulation-based training scenarios are essential.

methodsA low-cost, previously tested OSCE scenario for the evaluation of surgical skills in trauma was implemented as part of a short training boot camp for residents and recently graduated surgeons. The following stations were included bowel anastomosis, vascular anastomosis, penetrating lung injury, penetrating cardiac injury, and gastric perforation (laparoscopic suturing). A total of 75 participants from 15 different programs were recruited. Each station was videotaped in high definition and assessed in a remote and asynchronous manner. The level of competency was assessed through global and specific rating scales alongside procedural times. Self-confidence to perform the procedure as the leading surgeon was evaluated before and after training.

resultsStatistically significant differences were found in pre-training scores between groups for all stations. The lowest scores were obtained in the cardiac and lung injury stations. After training, participants significantly increased their level of competence in both grading systems. Procedural times for the pulmonary tractotomy, bowel anastomosis, and vascular anastomosis stations increased after training. A significant improvement in self-confidence was shown in all stations.

conclusionAn OSCE scenario for training surgical skills in trauma was effective in improving proficiency level and self-confidence. Low pre-training scores and level of confidence in the cardiac and lung injury stations represent a deficit in residency programs that should be addressed. The incorporation of simulation-based teaching tools at early stages in residency would be beneficial when future surgeons face extremely severe trauma scenarios.

Indexed as

COVID-19General SurgeryInternship and ResidencyLung InjurySimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceHumansPandemicsSimulation trainingSurgical education technologySurgical trainingTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID35237901
PMCPMC8890468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.