ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
Medical 3D Printing Dimensional Accuracy for Multi-pathological Anatomical Models 3D Printed Using Material Extrusion.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Machining Allowance, Build Orientation, and Cutting Parameters on Hole Quality in Additively Manufactured ABS Components.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From local validation to global standardization of three-dimensional printing in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A multicentre audit of the geometric accuracy and water equivalence of 3D printed thermoplastic objects for use in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Advanced Manufacturing of PLA Surgical Templates for Orbital Floor Geometry: Optimizing Fidelity and Surface Morphology via Variable Layer Height MEX 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Applications of 3D Printing and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Management: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Printing outsourced orthognathic surgical splints in-house: a dimensional verification process for point-of-care printing.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Knowledge Mapping and Global Trends in Simulation in Medical Education: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Multi-Site evaluation of a novel point-of-care 3D printing quality assurance protocol for a material jetting 3D printer.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Dimensional Accuracy Assessment of Medical Anatomical Models Produced by Hospital-Based Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printer.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Dimensional Accuracy in 3D Printed Medical Models: A Follow-Up Study on SLA and SLS Technology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review.3D printing in medicine · 2024Article
- Trueness of cone-beam computed tomography-derived skull models fabricated by different technology-based three-dimensional printers.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Utilizing 3D printing to assist pre-procedure planning of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures: a pilot study.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- Navigating the intersection of 3D printing, software regulation and quality control for point-of-care manufacturing of personalized anatomical models.3D printing in medicine · 2023Article
- The biomechanical behavior of 3D printed human femoral bones based on generic and patient-specific geometries.3D printing in medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting.3D printing in medicine · 2022Article
- Comparative Morphometric Study of the Osseous Labyrinth in Humans and Animal Models Using Centerline Analysis.Noise & healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical 3D printing of anatomical models is being increasingly applied in healthcare facilities. The accuracy of such 3D-printed anatomical models is an important aspect of their overall quality control. The purpose of this research was to test whether the accuracy of a variety of anatomical models 3D printed using Material Extrusion (MEX) lies within a reasonable tolerance level, defined as less than 1-mm dimensional error. Six medical models spanning across anatomical regions (musculoskeletal, neurological, abdominal, cardiovascular) and sizes (model volumes ranging from ~ 4 to 203 cc) were chosen for the primary study. Three measurement landing blocks were strategically designed within each of the six medical models to allow high-resolution caliper measurements. An 8-cc reference cube was printed as the 7th model in the primary study. In the secondary study, the effect of model rotation and scale was assessed using two of the models from the first study. All models were 3D printed using an Ultimaker 3 printer in triplicates. All absolute measurement errors were found to be less than 1 mm with a maximum error of 0.89 mm. The maximum relative error was 2.78%. The average absolute error was 0.26 mm, and the average relative error was 0.71% in the primary study, and the results were similar in the secondary study with an average absolute error of 0.30 mm and an average relative error of 0.60%. The relative errors demonstrated certain patterns in the data, which were explained based on the mechanics of MEX 3D printing. Results indicate that the MEX process, when carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis, could be suitable for the 3D printing of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning if an accuracy level of 1 mm is deemed sufficient for the application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.