Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237852›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2022

Stakeholder Perspectives on COVID-19 and Household Water Access in Vulnerable Communities in the Mekong Region.

Louis Lebel, Nilar Aung, Chau Thi Minh Long, Phoummixay Siharath, Phimphakan Lebel, Hap Navy, Chu Thai Hoanh, Boripat Lebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Louis LebelUnit for Social and Environmental Research, Department of Social Science and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6187-6418
Nilar AungUniversity of Yangon, Yangon, Myanmar.
Chau Thi Minh LongWestern Highlands Agriculture and Forestry Science Institute, Dak Lak, Vietnam.
Phoummixay SiharathDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Laos, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Phimphakan LebelUnit for Social and Environmental Research, Department of Social Science and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Hap NavyInland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Fisheries Administration, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chu Thai HoanhInternational Water Management Institute, Regional Office for Southeast Asia, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Boripat LebelUnit for Social and Environmental Research, Department of Social Science and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. boripatlebel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5564-8379

Funding

Sustainable Mekong Research Network (SUMERNET) 100099231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the importance of safe access to sufficient clean water in vulnerable communities, renewing interest in water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) programs and related targets under Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6). The purpose of this study was to better understand the obstacles to water access in vulnerable communities and identify ways they might be addressed in five countries in the Mekong Region (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam). To this end, qualitative interviews with 50 government officials and development or health experts were complimented with a quantitative survey of the experiences and views of individuals in 15 vulnerable communities. There were several key findings. First, difficulties in accessing sufficient clean water for drinking and hygiene persist in certain vulnerable communities, including informal urban settlements, remote minority villages, and migrant worker camps. Second, limited rights, high prices, and remote locations were common obstacles to household access to improved water sources. Third, seasonal differences in the availability of clean water, alongside other disruptions to supply such as restrictions on movement in COVID-19 responses, drove households towards lower quality sources. Fourth, there are multiple threats to water quality from source to consumption that should be addressed by monitoring, treatment, and watershed protection. Fifth, stakeholder groups differ from each other and residents of vulnerable communities regarding the significance of water access, supply and quality difficulties, and how they should be addressed. The paper ends with a set of program suggestions addressing these water-related difficulties.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drinking WaterHumansHygienePandemicsSanitationWater SupplyDrinking WaterCOVID-19Drinking waterMekong RegionWASH; SDG 6Water access

Identifiers

PMID35237852
PMCPMC8890463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.