Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237822›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2021

Designs, applications, and limitations of genetically encoded fluorescent sensors to explore plant biology.

Mayuri Sadoine, Yuuma Ishikawa, Thomas J Kleist, Michael M Wudick, Masayoshi Nakamura, Guido Grossmann, Wolf B Frommer, Cheng-Hsun Ho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The switch-liker's guide to plant synthetic gene circuits.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Apollo-NADPScience advances · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Lighting the light reactions of photosynthesis by means of redox-responsive genetically encoded biosensors for photosynthetic intermediates.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mayuri SadoineMolecular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0217-6731
Yuuma IshikawaMolecular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
Thomas J KleistMolecular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-7323
Michael M WudickMolecular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4332-369X
Masayoshi NakamuraInstitute of Transformative Bio-Molecules (WPI-ITbM), Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-4942
Guido GrossmannCluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7529-9244
Wolf B FrommerMolecular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6465-0115
Cheng-Hsun HoAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-1914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The understanding of signaling and metabolic processes in multicellular organisms requires knowledge of the spatial dynamics of small molecules and the activities of enzymes, transporters, and other proteins in vivo, as well as biophysical parameters inside cells and across tissues. The cellular distribution of receptors, ligands, and activation state must be integrated with information about the cellular distribution of metabolites in relation to metabolic fluxes and signaling dynamics in order to achieve the promise of in vivo biochemistry. Genetically encoded sensors are engineered fluorescent proteins that have been developed for a wide range of small molecules, such as ions and metabolites, or to report biophysical processes, such as transmembrane voltage or tension. First steps have been taken to monitor the activity of transporters in vivo. Advancements in imaging technologies and specimen handling and stimulation have enabled researchers in plant sciences to implement sensor technologies in intact plants. Here, we provide a brief history of the development of genetically encoded sensors and an overview of the types of sensors available for quantifying and visualizing ion and metabolite distribution and dynamics. We further discuss the pros and cons of specific sensor designs, imaging systems, and sample manipulations, provide advice on the choice of technology, and give an outlook into future developments.

Indexed as

BiologyBiological TransportBiosensing TechniquesFluorescent DyesIonsLuminescent ProteinsMolecular ImagingPlantsSignal TransductionFluorescent DyesIonsLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35237822
PMCPMC8491070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.