ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of three-dimensional lens parameters in patients with age-related cataracts.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Investigation of ciliary body inner diameter in Chinese myopic adults using ArcScan Insight® 100.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Expansion of genotypic and phenotypic findings inAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- Age-Related Changes in Lens Elasticity Contribute More to Accommodative Decline Than Shape Change.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Ultrasonographic assessment of ocular parameters in dogs: effects of weight and breed, controlled for BCS and age.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Exploring Nomograms for Implantable Collamer Lens Size Selection in Myopia: A Literature-based Compilation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- The relationships between lens diameter and ocular biometric parameters: an ultrasound biomicroscopy-based study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimTo assess the reproducibility of the novel ultrasound biomicroscopy, Insight 100 and its agreement with a swept-source optical coherence tomography, CASIA2.
methodsA total of 96 volunteers (96 eyes) were enrolled. The radius of anterior lens curvature (RAL), the radius of posterior lens curvature (RPL), lens thickness (LT), and lens diameter (LD) were measured with Insight 100 and CASIA2. A semiautomated software was used to adjust the measurement of LT (LT
resultsFor Insight 100 measurements, the intraobserver ICCs of RAL, RPL, LT
conclusionInsight 100 could obtain highly repeatable lens biometry
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.