Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237546›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Incidence, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward Needle Stick Injury Among Health Care Workers in Abha City, Saudi Arabia.

Abdullah Alsabaani, Norah Saeed S Alqahtani, Sarah Saeed S Alqahtani, Jawaher Hussain J Al-Lugbi, Malak Ali Saleh Asiri, Shyamaa Elsayed Elaraby Salem, Ali Ahmed Alasmari, Syed Esam Mahmood, Mesheil Alalyani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdullah AlsabaaniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Norah Saeed S AlqahtaniOral Surgery Department, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Sarah Saeed S AlqahtaniGeneral Surgery Department, Armed Forces Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Jawaher Hussain J Al-LugbiObstetrics & Gynaecology Department, Armed Forces Hospital, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.
Malak Ali Saleh AsiriPediatric Neurology Department, Abha Maternity and Pediatric Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Shyamaa Elsayed Elaraby SalemOccupational Health Clinic, Infection Control Department, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Ahmed AlasmariThe Residency Program for Saudi Board in Community Medicine, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Syed Esam MahmoodDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mesheil AlalyaniCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA needle stick injury is a serious occupational health hazard in health care settings. Health care workers are at risk of bloodborne diseases and the psychological consequences of these injuries. This study aims to estimate the incidence of needle stick injuries among healthcare workers during the previous 12 months and to assess their knowledge, attitude, and practice toward these injuries.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from 1st August 2019 till 15th February 2020, and included 786 healthcare workers in Abha city, Saudi Arabia. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data.

resultsThe incidence of needle stick injury among healthcare workers during the previous 12 months was (91/786) 11.57%. Nurses, females, and Saudis reported most needle stick injuries. More than half (52.7%) of the injuries went unreported. About 52.7% of needle stick injuries occurred during using sharp devices, and 42.9% of injuries happened in the patient room. The incidence of needle stick injury was significantly higher among those working at the secondary healthcare level (

conclusionNeedle stick injury and its under reporting among healthcare professionals is still a prevalent risk. Raising awareness among healthcare workers and improving the reporting systems for needle stick injuries to ensure more protection and early use of post-exposure prophylaxis is required. Implementation of safety precautions and safe injection practices and providing engineered safety devices may further reduce the risk.

Indexed as

Needlestick InjuriesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansIncidenceSaudi ArabiaAbhaattitudebloodborne diseaseshealth care workersincidenceneedle stick injurypracticesafe injection

Identifiers

PMID35237546
PMCPMC8882610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.