Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237511›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A Deep Learning Image Data Augmentation Method for Single Tumor Segmentation.

Chunling Zhang, Nan Bao, Hang Sun, Hong Li, Jing Li, Wei Qian, Shi Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chunling ZhangCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Nan BaoCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Hang SunCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Hong LiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Wei QianCollege of Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States.
Shi ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Northeastern University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CNGuiyang Medical University · CNThe University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical imaging examination is the primary method of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer. However, the amount of medical image data is often not enough to meet deep learning needs. This article aims to expand the small data set in tumor segmentation based on the deep learning method.

methodsThis method includes three main parts: image cutting and mirroring augmentation, segmentation of augmented images, and boundary reconstruction. Firstly, the image is divided into four parts horizontally & vertically, and diagonally along the tumor's approximate center. Then each part is mirrored to get a new image and hence a four times data set. Next, the deep learning network trains the augmented data and gets the corresponding segmentation model. Finally, the segmentation boundary of the original tumor is obtained by boundary compensation and reconstruction.

resultsCombined with Mask-RCNN and U-Net, this study carried out experiments on a public breast ultrasound data set. The results show that the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value obtained by horizontal and vertical cutting and mirroring augmentation and boundary reconstruction improved by 9.66% and 12.43% compared with no data augmentation. Moreover, the DSC obtained by diagonal cutting and mirroring augmentation and boundary reconstruction method improved by 9.46% and 13.74% compared with no data augmentation. Compared with data augmentation methods (cropping, rotating, and mirroring), this method's DSC improved by 4.92% and 12.23% on Mask-RCNN and U-Net.

conclusionCompared with the traditional methods, the proposed data augmentation method has better performance in single tumor segmentation.

Indexed as

breast cancerdata augmentationdeep learningsegmentationtumor

Identifiers

PMID35237511
PMCPMC8882602
OpenAlexW4213321889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.