Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237377›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2021

ASSESSING SELECTION BIAS IN REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS ESTIMATED FROM NONPROBABILITY SAMPLES WITH APPLICATIONS TO GENETICS AND DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEYS.

Brady T West, Roderick J Little, Rebecca R Andridge, Philip S Boonstra, Erin B Ware, Anita Pandit, Fernanda Alvarado-Leiton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brady T WestSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Roderick J LittleDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.
Rebecca R AndridgeDivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Ohio State University.
Philip S BoonstraDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.
Erin B WareSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Anita PanditDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.
Fernanda Alvarado-LeitonMichigan Program in Survey and Data Science, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Funding

DNA Methylation, Genetics, and Modifiable Risk Factors of Dementia in a Nationally Representative, Multi-Ethnic Cohort - Diversity SupplementR01AG067592 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BAKULSKI, KELLY, WARE, ERIN BAKSHIS · 2020 to 2025
$3.8M
Characterizing disparities in late-onset Alzheimer's disease risk through polygenic risk and epidemiologic factors in the Health and Retirement SurveyR01AG055406 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BAKULSKI, KELLY, WARE, ERIN BAKSHIS · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Indices of Selection Bias for Non‐Probability SamplesR21HD090366 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEST, BRADY T · 2017 to 2018
$401k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055406NIA NIH HHS R01 AG067592NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD090366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection bias is a serious potential problem for inference about relationships of scientific interest based on samples without well-defined probability sampling mechanisms. Motivated by the potential for selection bias in: (a) estimated relationships of polygenic scores (PGSs) with phenotypes in genetic studies of volunteers and (b) estimated differences in subgroup means in surveys of smartphone users, we derive novel measures of selection bias for estimates of the coefficients in linear and probit regression models fitted to nonprobability samples, when aggregate-level auxiliary data are available for the selected sample and the target population. The measures arise from normal pattern-mixture models that allow analysts to examine the sensitivity of their inferences to assumptions about nonignorable selection in these samples. We examine the effectiveness of the proposed measures in a simulation study and then use them to quantify the selection bias in: (a) estimated PGS-phenotype relationships in a large study of volunteers recruited via Facebook and (b) estimated subgroup differences in mean past-year employment duration in a nonprobability sample of low-educated smartphone users. We evaluate the performance of the measures in these applications using benchmark estimates from large probability samples.

Indexed as

Linear regressionNational Survey of Family Growthnonprobability samplespolygenic scoresprobit regressionselection bias

Identifiers

PMID35237377
PMCPMC8887878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.