Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237341›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

Classification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Radiomic Analysis.

Xiaoliang Xu, Yingfan Mao, Yanqiu Tang, Yang Liu, Cailin Xue, Qi Yue, Qiaoyu Liu, Jincheng Wang, Yin Yin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fusion of shallow and deep features fromQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Application of AI on cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoliang XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-6193
Yingfan MaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yanqiu TangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Drum Tower Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Cailin XueDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Qi YueDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Qiaoyu LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9247-1525
Jincheng WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-2388
Yin YinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-4278
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConsidering the narrow window of surgery, early diagnosis of liver cancer is still a fundamental issue to explore. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) are considered as two different types of liver cancer because of their distinct pathogenesis, pathological features, prognosis, and responses to adjuvant therapies. Qualitative analysis of image is not enough to make a discrimination of liver cancer, especially early-stage HCC or ICCA.

methodsThis retrospective study developed a radiomic-based model in a training cohort of 122 patients. Radiomic features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans. Feature selection was operated with the least absolute shrinkage and operator (LASSO) logistic method. The support vector machine (SVM) was selected to build a model. An internal validation was conducted in 89 patients.

resultsIn the training set, the AUC of the evaluation of the radiomics was 0.855 higher than for radiologists at 0.689. In the valuation cohorts, the AUC of the evaluation was 0.847 and the validation was 0.659, which indicated that the established model has a significantly better performance in distinguishing the HCC from ICCA.

conclusionWe developed a radiomic diagnosis model based on CT image that can quickly distinguish HCC from ICCA, which may facilitate the differential diagnosis of HCC and ICCA in the future.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaCohort StudiesComputational BiologyDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector MachineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35237341
PMCPMC8885247
OpenAlexW4213287464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.