Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237262›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Machine Learning Algorithms Identify Clinical Subtypes and Cancer in Anti-TIF1γ+ Myositis: A Longitudinal Study of 87 Patients.

Lijuan Zhao, Shuoshan Xie, Bin Zhou, Chuyu Shen, Liya Li, Weiwei Pi, Zhen Gong, Jing Zhao, Qi Peng, Junyu Zhou and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Lijuan ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shuoshan XieDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Bin ZhouDepartment of Nephrology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Chuyu ShenDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liya LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Weiwei PiDepartment of Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China.
Zhen GongDepartment of Rheumatology, Yiyang Central Hospital, Yiyang, China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jishou University, Jishou, China.
Qi PengDepartment of Rheumatology, Yueyang People's Hospital, Yueyang, China.
Junyu ZhouDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiaqi PengHuaihua No.1 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanhua University, Huaihua, China.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Lingxiao ZouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liang SongHuaihua No.1 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanhua University, Huaihua, China.
Honglin ZhuDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hui LuoDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiangya Hospital Central South University · CNHuaihua University · CNThird Xiangya Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNHunan Provincial People's Hospital · CNJishou University · CNQingdao University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First People's Hospital of Changde · CNYichang Central People's Hospital · CNYueyang Second People's Hospital · CNZhuzhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-TIF1γ antibodies are a class of myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and are closely associated with adult cancer-associated myositis (CAM). The heterogeneity in anti-TIF1γ+ myositis is poorly explored, and whether anti-TIF1γ+ patients will develop cancer or not is unknown at their first diagnosis. Here, we aimed to explore the subtypes of anti-TIF1γ+ myositis and construct machine learning classifiers to predict cancer in anti-TIF1γ+ patients based on clinical features.

methodsA cohort of 87 anti-TIF1γ+ patients were enrolled and followed up in Xiangya Hospital from June 2017 to June 2021. Sankey diagrams indicating temporal relationships between anti-TIF1γ+ myositis and cancer were plotted. Elastic net and random forest were used to select and rank the most important variables. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot and hierarchical cluster analysis were performed to identify subtypes of anti-TIF1γ+ myositis. The clinical characteristics were compared among subtypes of anti-TIF1γ+ patients. Machine learning classifiers were constructed to predict cancer in anti-TIF1γ+ myositis, the accuracy of which was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsForty-seven (54.0%) anti-TIF1γ+ patients had cancer, 78.7% of which were diagnosed within 0.5 years of the myositis diagnosis. Fourteen variables contributing most to distinguishing cancer and non-cancer were selected and used for the calculation of the similarities (proximities) of samples and the construction of machine learning classifiers. The top 10 were disease duration, percentage of lymphocytes (L%), percentage of neutrophils (N%), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), sex, C-reactive protein (CRP), shawl sign, arthritis/arthralgia, V-neck sign, and anti-PM-Scl75 antibodies. Anti-TIF1γ+ myositis patients can be clearly separated into three clinical subtypes, which correspond to patients with low, intermediate, and high cancer risk, respectively. Machine learning classifiers [random forest, support vector machines (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), elastic net, and decision tree] had good predictions for cancer in anti-TIF1γ+ myositis patients. In particular, the prediction accuracy of random forest was >90%, and decision tree highlighted disease duration, NLR, and CRP as critical clinical parameters for recognizing cancer patients.

conclusionAnti-TIF1γ+ myositis can be separated into three distinct subtypes with low, intermediate, and high risk of cancer. Machine learning classifiers constructed with clinical characteristics have favorable performance in predicting cancer in anti-TIF1γ+ myositis, which can help physicians in choosing appropriate cancer screening programs.

Indexed as

MyositisNeoplasmsAdultAlgorithmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine Learninganti-TIF1γ antibodycancermachine learning algorithmsmyositispredictionsubtypes

Identifiers

PMID35237262
PMCPMC8883045
OpenAlexW4213167516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.