Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2022

Neural Mechanisms of Working Memory Accuracy Revealed by Recurrent Neural Networks.

Yuanqi Xie, Yichen Henry Liu, Christos Constantinidis, Xin Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trajectories of Response Inhibition Development in Adolescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. The cost of efficiency in flexible neural representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanqi XieDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Yichen Henry LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Christos ConstantinidisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF TRAINING IN VISUAL COGNITIVE TASKSR01EY017077 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHRISTOS CONSTANTINIDIS · 2006 to 2026
$6.0M
Neurophysiology of Working Memory Maturation in AdolescenceR01MH116675 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CONSTANTINIDIS, CHRISTOS, WHITLOW, CHRISTOPHER T · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Neurophysiology of cognitive development and response inhibitionR01MH117996 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CONSTANTINIDIS, CHRISTOS · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017077NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116675NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neural mechanisms of working memory has been a long-standing Neuroscience goal. Bump attractor models have been used to simulate persistent activity generated in the prefrontal cortex during working memory tasks and to study the relationship between activity and behavior. How realistic the assumptions of these models are has been a matter of debate. Here, we relied on an alternative strategy to gain insights into the computational principles behind the generation of persistent activity and on whether current models capture some universal computational principles. We trained Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to perform spatial working memory tasks and examined what aspects of RNN activity accounted for working memory performance. Furthermore, we compared activity in fully trained networks and immature networks, achieving only imperfect performance. We thus examined the relationship between the trial-to-trial variability of responses simulated by the network and different aspects of unit activity as a way of identifying the critical parameters of memory maintenance. Properties that spontaneously emerged in the artificial network strongly resembled persistent activity of prefrontal neurons. Most importantly, these included drift of network activity during the course of a trial that was causal to the behavior of the network. As a consequence, delay period firing rate and behavior were positively correlated, in strong analogy to experimental results from the prefrontal cortex. These findings reveal that delay period activity is computationally efficient in maintaining working memory, as evidenced by unbiased optimization of parameters in artificial neural networks, oblivious to the properties of prefrontal neurons.

Indexed as

deep learningneuronneurophysiologyprefrontal cortexshort term memory

Identifiers

PMID35237134
PMCPMC8883483
OpenAlexW4212880097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.