Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237120›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Partial Restoration of Spinal Cord Neural Continuity

Xiaoping Ren, Weihua Zhang, Jian Mo, Jie Qin, Yi Chen, Jie Han, Xinjian Feng, Linxuan Han, Sitan Feng, Haibo Liang and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoping RenDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Weihua ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Jian MoDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Jie QinDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Yi ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Jie HanDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Xinjian FengDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Linxuan HanDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Sitan FengDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Haibo LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Liangjue CenDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Xiaofei WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Chunxing HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Haixuan DengDepartment of Imaging, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Zhenbin CaoDepartment of Imaging, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Huihui YaoDepartment of Electrophysiology, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Rongyu LanDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Xiaogang WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China.
Shuai RenGlobal Initiative to Cure Paralysis (GICUP), Columbus, OH, United States.
Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal cord injury (SCI) can cause paralysis and serious chronic morbidity, and there is no effective treatment. Based on our previous experimental results of spinal cord fusion (SCF) in mice, rats, beagles, and monkeys, we developed a surgical protocol of SCF for paraplegic human patients. We designed a novel surgical procedure of SCF, called sural nerve transplantation (SNT), for human patients with lower thoracic SCI and distal cord dysfunction.

methodsWe conducted a clinical trial (ChiCTR2000030788) and performed SNT in 12 fully paraplegic patients due to SCI between T1 and T12. We assessed pre- and postoperative central nerve pain, motor function, sensory function, and autonomic nerve function. Conduction of action potentials across the sural nerve transplant was evaluated. Neural continuity was also examined by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

resultsAmong the 12 paraplegic patients enrolled in this clinical trial, seven patients demonstrated improved autonomic nerve functions. Seven patients had clinically significant relief of their symptoms of cord central pain. One patient, however, developed postoperative cord central pain (VAS: 4). Five patients had varying degrees of recovered sensory and/or motor functions below the single neurologic level 1 month after surgery. One patient showed recovery of electrophysiologic, motor-evoked potentials 6 months after the operation. At 6 months after surgery, DTI indicated fusion and nerve connections of white cord and sural nerves in seven patients.

conclusionSNT was able to fuse the axonal stumps of white cord and sural nerve and at least partially improve the cord central pain in most patients. Although SNT did not restore the spinal cord continuity in white matter in some patients, SNT could restore spinal cord continuity in the cortico-trunco-reticulo-propriospinal pathway, thereby restoring in part some motor and sensory functions. SNT may therefore be a safe, feasible, and effective method to treat paraplegic patients with SCI. Future clinical trials should be performed to optimize the type/technique of nerve transplantation, reduce surgical damage, and minimize postoperative scar formation and adhesion, to avoid postoperative cord central pain. CLINICAL

trial registration[http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=50526], identifier [ChiCTR2000030788].

Indexed as

clinic trialcord central painGEMINIparaplegiapolyethylene glycolspinal cord fusionspinal cord injuryspinal cord transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35237120
PMCPMC8882688
OpenAlexW4212782725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.