Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237030›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2022

Cortical Trajectory Fixation Versus Traditional Pedicle-Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hongtao Ding, Yong Hai, Yuzeng Liu, Li Guan, Aixing Pan, Xinuo Zhang, Bo Han, Yue Li, Peng Yin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Trial
  4. Robotic-assisted fixation with cortical bone trajectory versus conventional pedicle trajectory for short-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongtao DingDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5027-8842
Yong HaiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7206-325X
Yuzeng LiuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Li GuanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Aixing PanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinuo ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Bo HanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yue LiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peng YinDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designThis was a prospective randomized controlled trial study.

objectiveTo elucidate clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of cortical bone trajectory (CBT)-screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis at 24-month follow-up and to compare the results with those after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using traditional pedicle screw (PS) fixation.

methodsWe enrolled 124 patients and randomly assigned them to two groups (each group had 62 participants). The primary outcome was fusion rate. Secondary outcomes were VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, operation duration, incision length, estimated blood loss, drainage volume, radiological outcomes, and complications.

resultsAt the 6- and 12-month follow-up points, similar fusion rates were observed based on CT scans in both groups (

conclusionCBT-screw fixation for single-level lumbar fusion in patients with osteoporosis provided improvement in clinical symptoms comparable to that of TLIF using PS fixation. Significantly better lumbar stability was found in the CBT group. We suggest that CBT-screw fixation is a reasonable and superior alternative to PS in TLIF in osteoporosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900022658. DATE OF REGISTRATION: April 20, 2019.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationOsteoporosisPedicle ScrewsSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomecortical bone-trajectory screwlumbar fusionosteoporosispedicle screwrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35237030
PMCPMC8882472
OpenAlexW4213134696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.