Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237026›Full record

ArticlePsychology of women quarterly2019

"No [Right] Way to be a Black Woman": Exploring Gendered Racial Socialization Among Black Women.

BreAnna L Davis Tribble, Samuel H Allen, John R Hart, Tiffany S Francois, Mia A Smith-Bynum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of women quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Natural Hair: a Vital Component to Black Women's Health.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

BreAnna L Davis TribbleUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Samuel H AllenUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
John R HartUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Tiffany S FrancoisUniversity of Maryland, College Park.
Mia A Smith-BynumUniversity of Maryland, College Park.

Funding

Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MICHAEL S. RENDALL · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the theoretical lenses of intersectionality and racial-ethnic socialization, we conducted a focus group study with 29 Black women. We analyzed transcripts for the sources of messages about skin color and hair and for participants' responses to these messages via a grounded theory approach. Family members were the primary source of messages about skin color and hair. Peers and the media also communicated such messages. Messages ranged from endorsement of Western standards of beauty to an embrace of darker skin colors and natural hair texture. Rather than serving as passive recipients of messages, participants sifted through and reconciled messages with varying degrees of resolution. Their accounts reflected their intersectional experiences as Black women, representing a variety of physical attributes. We discuss the influence of these physical attributes on their individual racial-gender identity development in light of a second burgeoning Black hair movement that embraces Black natural hair in the U.S. Findings may help families and others build understanding of and increase sensitivity towards the intra- and interpersonal implications of colorism for Black women. Findings may also inform institutional policies (e.g., school, work) and practices such that they no longer create barriers or yield consequences for the Black women navigating these settings.

Indexed as

Black familiesBlack womencolorismnatural hairracial socializationskin color

Identifiers

PMID35237026
PMCPMC8887886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.