Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35236913›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Statistical distortion of supervised learning predictions in optical microscopy induced by image compression.

Enrico Pomarico, Cédric Schmidt, Florian Chays, David Nguyen, Arielle Planchette, Audrey Tissot, Adrien Roux, Stéphane Pagès, Laura Batti, Christoph Clausen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Enrico PomaricoHEPIA, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Rue de la Prairie 4, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland. enrico.pomarico@hesge.ch.
Cédric SchmidtHEPIA, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Rue de la Prairie 4, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florian ChaysHEPIA, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Rue de la Prairie 4, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
David NguyenLaboratory of Nanoscale Biology, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Arielle PlanchetteLaboratory of Nanoscale Biology, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Audrey TissotWyss Center for Bio- and Neuroengineering, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adrien RouxHEPIA, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Rue de la Prairie 4, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stéphane PagèsWyss Center for Bio- and Neuroengineering, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laura BattiWyss Center for Bio- and Neuroengineering, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christoph ClausenDotphoton SA, Zeughausgasse 17, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Theo LasserMax-Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Aleksandra RadenovicLaboratory of Nanoscale Biology, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno SanguinettiDotphoton SA, Zeughausgasse 17, 6300, Zug, Switzerland.
Jérôme ExtermannHEPIA, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Rue de la Prairie 4, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHFoton Motors (China) · CNWyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering · CHMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research · DEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of data throughput in optical microscopy has triggered the extensive use of supervised learning (SL) models on compressed datasets for automated analysis. Investigating the effects of image compression on SL predictions is therefore pivotal to assess their reliability, especially for clinical use. We quantify the statistical distortions induced by compression through the comparison of predictions on compressed data to the raw predictive uncertainty, numerically estimated from the raw noise statistics measured via sensor calibration. Predictions on cell segmentation parameters are altered by up to 15% and more than 10 standard deviations after 16-to-8 bits pixel depth reduction and 10:1 JPEG compression. JPEG formats with higher compression ratios show significantly larger distortions. Interestingly, a recent metrologically accurate algorithm, offering up to 10:1 compression ratio, provides a prediction spread equivalent to that stemming from raw noise. The method described here allows to set a lower bound to the predictive uncertainty of a SL task and can be generalized to determine the statistical distortions originated from a variety of processing pipelines in AI-assisted fields.

Indexed as

Data CompressionAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyReproducibility of ResultsSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID35236913
PMCPMC8891276
OpenAlexW4220655756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.