Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35236911›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The human-baited host decoy trap (HDT) is an efficient sampling device for exophagic Anopheles arabiensis within irrigated lands in southern Malawi.

Kennedy Zembere, James Chirombo, Peter Nasoni, Daniel P McDermott, Lizzie Tchongwe-Divala, Frances M Hawkes, Christopher M Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kennedy ZembereMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
James ChiromboMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Peter NasoniIllovo Sugar Estate, Nchalo, Malawi.
Daniel P McDermottDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Lizzie Tchongwe-DivalaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Frances M HawkesNatural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK.
Christopher M JonesMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi. chris.jones@lstmed.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme · MWNatural Resources Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P025404/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206545/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrigation schemes provide an ideal habitat for Anopheles mosquitoes particularly during the dry season. Reliable estimates of outdoor host-seeking behaviour are needed to assess the impact of vector control options and this is particularly the case for Anopheles arabiensis which displays a wide range of behaviours that circumvent traditional indoor-insecticide based control. In this study we compared the sampling efficiency of the host decoy trap (HDT) with the human landing catch (HLC) and Suna trap in a repeated Latin square design in two villages (Lengwe and Mwanza) on an irrigated sugar estate in southern Malawi. Over the course of 18 trapping nights, we caught 379 female Anopheles, the majority of which were identified as An. arabiensis. Across both villages, there was no detectable difference in Anopheles catch between the HDT compared with the HLC (RR = 0.85, P = 0.508). The overall sensitivity of the HLC was greater than the Suna trap regardless of mosquito density (Lengwe, α = 2.75, 95% credible interval: 2.03-3.73; Mwanza, α = 3.38, 95% credible interval: 1.50-9.30) whereas the sensitivity of the HDT was only greater than the Suna trap when mosquito numbers were high (Lengwe, α = 2.63, 95% credible interval: 2.00-3.85).We conclude that the HDT is an effective sampling device for outdoor host seeking An. arabiensis in southern Malawi. The presence of An. arabiensis in irrigated lands during the dry season poses a challenge for ongoing indoor vector control efforts.

Indexed as

AnophelesMosquito ControlAnimalsEntomologyFemaleHumansMalawiMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID35236911
PMCPMC8891353
OpenAlexW4214837501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.