ReviewArthroplasty (London, England)2021
After 25 years of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, where do we stand today?
Review in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotics and Computer Navigation Do Not Offer Notable Benefits Compared with Manual Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- Perioperative safety and accuracy of CT-based fully active burr-based robotic total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Mixed-Reality Guidance for Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With More Accurate Femoral Resection but Longer Operative Time Compared to Accelerometer-Based Guidance.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Individualized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the OriginJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Concurrent validation of a novel intraoperative navigation platform for total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Ten-year functional outcomes and up to 18-year survivorship of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: analysis of 1677 cases from a high-volume centre.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Current concepts of medial unicompartmental knee replacement: part 2-hot topics and further directions.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Review
- Comparison between robotic-assisted and navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty shows comparable outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- High accuracy and learning curve improvement of augmented reality in total knee arthroplasty: A single-centre study on 157 patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of computer-assisted Ci™ navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
- Progress in Computer-Assisted Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis with Extra-Articular Deformity.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Does Robotic Assisted Technique Improve Patient Utility in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Surgical navigation for targeted retroperitoneal lymph-node removal: a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- A Retrospective Study to Compare Patient Outcomes from Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) versus Navigation-Guided Arthroplasty Using the Brainlab Software-Guided Surgical System at a Center in Hebei Province January 2021 to July 2023.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Review
- [Trends in navigation-handheld systems].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: historical perspectives and current innovations.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
- Mismatch between trochlear coronal alignment of arthritic knees and currently available prosthesis: a morphological analysis of 4116 knees and 45 implant designs.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Alignment analysis of Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty using the adjusted mechanical method.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimb and implant alignment along with soft tissue balance plays a vital role in the outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer navigation for TKA was first introduced in 1997 with the aim of implanting the prosthetic components with accuracy and precision. This review discusses the technique, current status, and scientific evidence pertaining to computer-navigated TKA. BODY: The adoption of navigated TKA has slowly but steadily increased across the globe since its inception 25 years ago. It has been more rapid in some countries like Australia than others, like the UK. Contemporary, large console-based navigation systems help control almost every aspect of TKA, including the depth and orientation of femoral and tibial resections, soft-tissue release, and customization of femoral and tibial implant positions in order to obtain desired alignment and balance. Navigated TKA results in better limb and implant alignment and reduces outliers as compared to conventional TKA. However, controversy still exists over whether improved alignment provides superior function and longevity. Surgeons may also be hesitant to adopt this technology due to the associated learning curve, slightly increased surgical time, fear of pin site complications, and the initial set-up cost. Furthermore, the recent advent of robotic-assisted TKA which provides benefits like precision in bone resections and avoiding soft-tissue damage due to uncontrolled sawing, in addition to those of computer navigation, might be responsible for the latter technology taking a backseat.
conclusionThis review summarizes the current state of computer-navigated TKA. The superiority of computer navigation to conventional TKA in improving accuracy is well established. Robotic-assisted TKA provides enhanced functionality as compared to computer navigation but is significantly more expensive. Whether robotic-assisted TKA offers any substantive advantages over navigation is yet to be conclusively proven. Irrespective of the form, the use of computer-assisted TKA is on the rise worldwide and is here to stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.