Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35236502›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Building organizational readiness: initial field testing of an expert-informed typology of implementation strategies.

Sigal Vax, Marianne Farkas, Kim T Mueser, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Zlatka Russinova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sigal VaxRehabilitation Sciences Program, College of Health & Rehabilitation: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, USA. sigalvax@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4463-9442
Marianne FarkasCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, College of Health & Rehabilitation: Sargent College, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave W, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-0382
Kim T MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, College of Health & Rehabilitation: Sargent College, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave W, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-8314
Mari-Lynn DrainoniSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7214-8037
Zlatka RussinovaCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, College of Health & Rehabilitation: Sargent College, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave W, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-5537

Funding

Worksite Health Promotion: Private-Public PartnershipsR01DP000096 · DP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GOETZEL, RON Z · 2004 to 2006
$461k
ACL HHS 90DP0096NCCDPHP CDC HHS R01 DP000096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganizational readiness is a known barrier to implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community mental health services. A robust methodology for enhancing organizational readiness for implementation (ORI) has the potential to improve implementation outcomes of EBPs and ensure better services for people with a psychiatric disability. Prior work established a framework of implementation strategies targeting ORI enhancement by asking a group of implementation experts from various fields to categorize strategies from the "Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change" (ERIC) Project into three readiness stages, consistent with the pre-action stages of the Transtheoretical Model of behavioral change: Pre-contemplation, Contemplation, and Preparation. The current study provides initial confirmation and refinement to this expert-driven typology based on community mental health field experiences.

methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with stakeholders involved in a recent EBP implementation project. Participants included staff (n=9) from four community mental health agencies and the implementation team who facilitated the project (n=3). Their pre-implementation experiences were compared with the experts' typology to identify consistencies and discrepancies.

resultsThe participants' experiences were congruent with two thirds of the strategies identified by the experts for specific ORI stages. The refinements included 12 strategies used in additional stages beyond the experts' classification, four strategies from the ERIC list that were not included in the ORI typology, and five new strategies.

conclusionsThis study provides initial confirmation and refinements to the previously published ORI typology. The results offer guidance as to how ORI could be enhanced in the community mental health field.

Indexed as

Community mental healthEmployment servicesEvidence-based practicesImplementation strategiesOrganizational readiness for changePre-implementationPsychiatric rehabilitationPsychosocial interventionsTranstheoretical model

Identifiers

PMID35236502
PMCPMC8889398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.