Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35236002›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of talazoparib in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of hepatic impairment.

Cen Guo, Yanke Yu, Jayeta Chakrabarti, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Rebecca Moroose, Anna Plotka, Haihong Shi, Chandrasekar Durairaj, Diane D Wang, Zev A Wainberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cen GuoPfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Yanke YuPfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Jayeta ChakrabartiPfizer Ltd., Surrey, UK.
Sarina A Piha-PaulInvestigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rebecca MorooseOrlando Health Inc., Orlando, Florida, USA.
Anna PlotkaPfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Haihong ShiPfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Chandrasekar DurairajPfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Diane D WangPfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Zev A WainbergUniversity of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USOrlando Health · USPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis phase I study investigated talazoparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with advanced solid tumours and varying degrees of hepatic function.

methodsPatients with advanced solid tumours and normal hepatic function or varying degrees of hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe, based on National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group classification) received talazoparib 0.5 mg once daily for 22 calendar days. Plasma and urine samples after single and multiple doses were collected and analysed for talazoparib using validated assays. Plasma PK data from all patients were analysed using the population PK method. Plasma and urine PK parameters in PK-evaluable patients were calculated using noncompartmental analysis (NCA). Safety was monitored in all enrolled patients.

resultsThirty-eight patients were enrolled; 37 had ≥1 PK concentration, among which 17 were evaluable for NCA. Population PK analysis (n = 37) indicated no significant impact of hepatic function on apparent clearance (CL/F) of talazoparib. Baseline creatinine clearance was the only significant covariate on CL/F (α = 0.05). NCA of data (n = 17) showed no clear trend for increase in exposure on day 22 with worsening hepatic function. Talazoparib protein binding was comparable in patients with varying hepatic function. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and the safety profile observed in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug.

conclusionsHepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe) has no impact on the PK of talazoparib. No dose modification is recommended for patients with advanced solid tumours and various degrees of hepatic impairment, and this labelling language has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

Indexed as

Liver DiseasesNeoplasmsPhthalazinesHumansPhthalazinestalazoparibhepatic impairmentpharmacokineticsphase IPK modellingtalazoparib

Identifiers

PMID35236002
PMCPMC9314093
OpenAlexW4214939689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.