Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235699›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2022

New developments of biofluid-based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia.

Marta Del Campo, Henrik Zetterberg, Sam Gandy, Chiadi U Onyike, Fabricio Oliveira, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Alberto Lleó, Charlotte E Teunissen, Yolande Pijnenburg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Marta Del CampoDepartamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain.
Henrik ZetterbergInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sam GandyDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Chiadi U OnyikeDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Fabricio OliveiraDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Chi Udeh-MomohAgeing Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alberto LleóNeurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Charlotte E TeunissenNeurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yolande PijnenburgAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHospital de Sant Pau · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidad San Pablo CEU · ESUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

European Research Council 681712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) covers a spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders with different phenotypes, genetic backgrounds, and pathological states. Its clinicopathological diversity challenges the diagnostic process and the execution of clinical trials, calling for specific diagnostic biomarkers of pathologic FTD types. There is also a need for biomarkers that facilitate disease staging, quantification of severity, monitoring in clinics and observational studies, and for evaluation of target engagement and treatment response in clinical trials. This review discusses current FTD biofluid-based biomarker knowledge taking into account the differing applications. The limitations, knowledge gaps, and challenges for the development and implementation of such markers are also examined. Strategies to overcome these hurdles are proposed, including the technologies available, patient cohorts, and collaborative research initiatives. Access to robust and reliable biomarkers that define the exact underlying pathophysiological FTD process will meet the needs for specific diagnosis, disease quantitation, clinical monitoring, and treatment development.

Indexed as

Frontotemporal DementiaNeurodegenerative DiseasesBiomarkersHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35235699
PMCPMC9790674
OpenAlexW4214885699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.