Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Are early childhood stunting and catch-up growth associated with school age cognition?-Evidence from an Indian birth cohort.

Beena Koshy, Manikandan Srinivasan, Sowmiya Gopalakrishnan, Venkata Raghava Mohan, Rebecca Scharf, Laura Murray-Kolb, Sushil John, Rachel Beulah, Jayaprakash Muliyil, Gagandeep Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Beena KoshyDevelopmental Paediatrics Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9058-1392
Manikandan SrinivasanWellcome research Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Sowmiya GopalakrishnanDevelopmental Paediatrics Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Venkata Raghava MohanCommunity Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Rebecca ScharfUniversity of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3381-5594
Laura Murray-KolbThe Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Sushil JohnLow Cost Effective Care Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Rachel BeulahDevelopmental Paediatrics Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Jayaprakash MuliyilWellcome research Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Gagandeep KangWellcome research Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMillions of children worldwide especially in the Asian subcontinent are vulnerable to early childhood stunting. There are contradictory reports of the association between catch-up growth in childhood and school age cognition.

methodsA community-based birth cohort recruited between 2010 and 2012 from urban slums in Vellore, India was followed up until 9 years of age. From regular anthropometric measurements, stunting status for each individual child was calculated at 2, 5 and 9 years. Cognition was assessed at 9 years of age using the Malin's Intelligence Scale for Indian Children (MISIC). Children were divided into groups based on stunting at each time point as well as catch-up growth, and a regression model was utilised to evaluate their association with cognition at 9 years.

resultsAmong 203 children included in this analysis, 94/203 (46.31%) children were stunted at 2 years of age, of whom 39.36% had a catch-up growth at 5 years of age, and 38.30% at 9 years. Around 10% of the cohort remained stunted at all time points. In the multivariable analysis, children who were stunted at 2, 5 and 9 years had a significantly lower verbal and total intelligence quotient (IQ) scores by 4.6 points compared to those who were never stunted. Children with catch up growth following stunting at 2 years had higher cognition scores than those who were persistently stunted throughout the childhood.

conclusionsThis study showed persistent stunting in childhood was associated with lowering of 4-5 IQ points in childhood cognition at 9 years of age. Recovery from early life stunting in children with catch up growth prevented further lowering of cognition scores in these children compared to persistently stunted children. Nutritional supplementation during late infancy and early toddlerhood in addition to continuing nutritional supplementation programmes for preschool and school children can improve childhood stunting and cognitive abilities in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

CognitionGrowth DisordersBirth CohortChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIndiaInfantIntelligenceMale

Identifiers

PMID35235588
PMCPMC8890627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.