Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effect of the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine on quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers in healthcare personnel.

Maria Elena Romero-Ibarguengoitia, Diego Rivera-Salinas, Yodira Guadalupe Hernández-Ruíz, Ana Gabriela Armendariz-Vázquez, Arnulfo González-Cantú, Irene Antonieta Barco-Flores, Rosalinda González-Facio, Laura Patricia Montelongo-Cruz, Gerardo Francisco Del Rio-Parra, Mauricio René Garza-Herrera and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Elena Romero-IbarguengoitiaDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-4043
Diego Rivera-SalinasDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Yodira Guadalupe Hernández-RuízDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Ana Gabriela Armendariz-VázquezDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Arnulfo González-CantúDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0103-0079
Irene Antonieta Barco-FloresDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Rosalinda González-FacioDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Laura Patricia Montelongo-CruzDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Gerardo Francisco Del Rio-ParraDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8148-8682
Mauricio René Garza-HerreraDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Jessica Andrea Leal-MeléndezDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Miguel Ángel Sanz-SánchezDepartment of Investigation, Hospital Clínica Nova de Monterrey, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
University of Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is our main strategy to control SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given the decrease in quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers three months after the second BNT162b2 dose, healthcare workers received a third booster six months after completing the original protocol. This study aimed to analyze the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers and the safety of the third dose. MATERIAL AND

methodsA prospective longitudinal cohort study included healthcare workers who received a third booster six months after completing the BNT162b2 regimen. We assessed the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers 21-28 days after the first and second dose, three months after the completed protocol, 1-7 days following the third dose, and 21-28 days after booster administration.

resultsThe cohort comprised 168 participants aged 41(10) years old, 67% of whom were female. The third dose was associated with an increase in quantitative antibody titers, regardless of previous SARS-CoV-2 history. In cases with a negative SARS-CoV-2 history, the median (IQR) antibody titer values increased from 379 (645.4) to 2960 (2010) AU/ml, whereas in cases with a positive SARS-CoV-2 history, from 590 (1262) to 3090 (2080) AU/ml (p<0.001). The third dose caused a lower number of total (local and systemic) adverse events following immunization (AEFI) compared with the first two vaccines. However, in terms of specific symptoms such as fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, fever, and adenopathy, the proportion was higher in comparison with the first and second doses (p<0.05). The most common AEFI after the third BNT162b2 vaccine was pain at the injection site (n = 82, 84.5%), followed by fatigue (n = 45, 46.4%) of mild severity (n = 36, 37.1%).

conclusionThe third dose applied six months after the original BNT162b2 regimen increased the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers. The booster dose was well tolerated and caused no severe AEFI.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19Health PersonnelImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAdultFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35235587
PMCPMC8890651
OpenAlexW4214849839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.