Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235453›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows.

Marylou Gabrié, Grant M Rotskoff, Eric Vanden-Eijnden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling hidden intermediate states in protein folding with AI-based conditional transition clustering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perspective: An outlook on fluorescence tracking.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Physics-Inspired Single-Particle Tracking Accelerated with Parallelism.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Deep learning probability flows and entropy production rates in active matter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Enhanced Sampling with Machine Learning.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Free energies at QM accuracy from force fields via multimap targeted estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marylou GabriéCenter for Computational Mathematics, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY 10010.ORCID 0000-0002-5989-1018
Grant M RotskoffDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-5179
Eric Vanden-EijndenCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-5854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceMonte Carlo methods, tools for sampling data from probability distributions, are widely used in the physical sciences, applied mathematics, and Bayesian statistics. Nevertheless, there are many situations in which it is computationally prohibitive to use Monte Carlo due to slow "mixing" between modes of a distribution unless hand-tuned algorithms are used to accelerate the scheme. Machine learning techniques based on generative models offer a compelling alternative to the challenge of designing efficient schemes for a specific system. Here, we formalize Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows and show that, with limited prior data and a physically inspired algorithm, we can substantially accelerate sampling with generative models.

Indexed as

free energy calculationsMonte Carlonormalizing flowsphase transitions

Identifiers

PMID35235453
PMCPMC8915891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.