Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235450›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Sister chromatids separate during anaphase in a three-stage program as directed by interaxis bridges.

Lingluo Chu, Zheng Zhang, Maria Mukhina, Denise Zickler, Nancy Kleckner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chromosome segregation synchrony inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Yeast Tools for Studying Type II Topoisomerases in Budding Yeast.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome control by SMC complexes.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Separase and Roads to Disengage Sister Chromatids during Anaphase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lingluo ChuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0002-3082-097X
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Maria MukhinaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0001-9656-1221
Denise ZicklerInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Nancy KlecknerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Harvard University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Chromosome organization and function in time and space: meiosis, mitosis and E. coliR35GM136322 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Nancy E Kleckner · 2020 to 2026
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During mitosis, from late prophase onward, sister chromatids are connected along their entire lengths by axis-linking chromatin/structure bridges. During prometaphase/metaphase, these bridges ensure that sister chromatids retain a parallel, paranemic relationship, without helical coiling, as they undergo compaction. Bridges must then be removed during anaphase. Motivated by these findings, the present study has further investigated the process of anaphase sister separation. Morphological and functional analyses of mammalian mitoses reveal a three-stage pathway in which interaxis bridges play a prominent role. First, sister chromatid axes globally separate in parallel along their lengths, with concomitant bridge elongation, due to intersister chromatin pushing forces. Sister chromatids then peel apart progressively from a centromere to telomere region(s), step-by-step. During this stage, poleward spindle forces dramatically elongate centromere-proximal bridges, which are then removed by a topoisomerase IIα–dependent step. Finally, in telomere regions, widely separated chromatids remain invisibly linked, presumably by catenation, with final separation during anaphase B. During this stage increased separation of poles and/or chromatin compaction appear to be the driving force(s). Cohesin cleavage licenses these events, likely by allowing bridges to respond to imposed forces. We propose that bridges are not simply removed during anaphase but, in addition, play an active role in ensuring smooth and synchronous microtubule-mediated sister separation. Bridges would thereby be the topological gatekeepers of sister chromatid relationships throughout all stages of mitosis.

Indexed as

AnaphaseChromatidsSister Chromatid ExchangeCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHumansCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIanaphasecohesininteraxis bridgesmitosisTopoII decatenation

Identifiers

PMID35235450
PMCPMC8915976
OpenAlexW4214825293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.