Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235448›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Rapid recruitment of p53 to DNA damage sites directs DNA repair choice and integrity.

Yu-Hsiu Wang, Teresa L F Ho, Anushya Hariharan, Hui Chin Goh, Yao Liang Wong, Nicole S Verkaik, May Yin Lee, Wai Leong Tam, Dik C van Gent, Ashok R Venkitaraman and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pro-ATO/Allicin Liposomes for Dual-Pathway Targeting of p53-Mutant Tumors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Histone Phosphorylation in DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yu-Hsiu WangMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, 117411 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-5535
Teresa L F HoDisease Intervention Technology Lab, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138632 Singapore.
Anushya HariharanMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, 117411 Singapore.
Hui Chin GohCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 117411 Singapore.
Yao Liang WongDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.ORCID 0000-0003-0298-8510
Nicole S VerkaikDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
May Yin LeeGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138632 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2366-9463
Wai Leong TamCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, 117411 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-5264
Dik C van GentDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-8148
Ashok R VenkitaramanDisease Intervention Technology Lab, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138632 Singapore.
Michael P SheetzMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, 117411 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-3430
David P LaneDisease Intervention Technology Lab, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138632 Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational University of Singapore · SGErasmus MC · NLUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceOur work focuses on the critical longstanding question of the nontranscriptional role of p53 in tumor suppression. We demonstrate here that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent modification of p53 enables rapid recruitment of p53 to damage sites, where it in turn directs early repair pathway selection. Specifically, p53-mediated recruitment of 53BP1 at early time points promotes nonhomologous end joining over the more error-prone microhomology end-joining. Similarly, p53 directs nucleotide excision repair by mediating DDB1 recruitment. This property of p53 also correlates with tumor suppression in vivo. Our study provides mechanistic insight into how certain transcriptionally deficient p53 mutants may retain tumor-suppressive functions through regulating the DNA damage response.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA End-Joining RepairCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansMutationNuclear ProteinsProtein DomainsTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Cell Cycle ProteinsDDB1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsNBN protein, humanNuclear ProteinsTP53BP1 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Tumor Suppressor Protein p53DNA repairlaser microirradiationp53recruitment kineticstumor suppression

Identifiers

PMID35235448
PMCPMC8915893
OpenAlexW4214884025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.