Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235184›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2022

Neuroimaging-ITM: A Text Mining Pipeline Combining Deep Adversarial Learning with Interaction Based Topic Modeling for Enabling the FAIR Neuroimaging Study.

Jianzhuo Yan, Lihong Chen, Yongchuan Yu, Hongxia Xu, Zhe Xu, Ying Sheng, Jianhui Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianzhuo YanFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Lihong ChenFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Yongchuan YuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Hongxia XuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Zhe XuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Ying ShengFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Jianhui ChenFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China. chenjianhui@bjut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharing various neuroimaging digital resources have received widespread attention in FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) neuroscience. In order to support a comprehensive understanding of brain cognition, neuroimaging provenance should be constructed to characterize both research processes and results, and integrates various digital resources for quick replication and open cooperation. This brings new challenges to neuroimaging text mining, including fragmented information, lack of labelled corpora, and vague topics. This paper proposes a text mining pipeline for enabling the FAIR neuroimaging study. In order to avoid fragmented information, the Brain Informatics provenance model is redesigned based on NIDM (Neuroimaging Data Model) and FAIR facets. It can systematically capture the provenance requests from the FAIR neuroimaging study and then transform them into a group of text mining tasks. A neuroimaging text mining pipeline combining deep adversarial learning with interaction based topic modeling, called neuroimaging interaction topic model (Neuroimaging-ITM), is proposed to automatically extract neuroimaging provenance and identify research topics in the few-shot scenario. Finally, a group of experiments is completed by using real data from the journal PloS One. The experimental results show that Neuroimaging-ITM can systematically and accurately extract provenance information and obtain high-quality research topics from the full text of neuroimaging articles. Most of the mean F1 values of provenance extraction exceed 0.9. The topic coherence and KL (Kullback-Leibler) divergence reach 9.95 and 0.96 respectively. The results are obviously better than baseline methods.

Indexed as

Data MiningNeurosciencesNeuroimagingDeep adversarial learningNeuroimaging provenanceText miningTopic learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.