Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35235156›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2022

Nanosized paclitaxel-loaded niosomes: formulation, in vitro cytotoxicity, and apoptosis gene expression in breast cancer cell lines.

Bahareh Pourmoghadasiyan, Fatemeh Tavakkoli, Farzaneh Mahmoudi Beram, Farzad Badmasti, Amir Mirzaie, Reza Kazempour, Shahrzad Rahimi, Setare Farokhi Larijani, Faranak Hejabi, Kamand Sedaghatnia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Bahareh Pourmoghadasiyan *Department of Biology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh Tavakkoli *Department of Biology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Farzaneh Mahmoudi BeramSchool of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad BadmastiDepartment of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Amir MirzaieDepartment of Biology, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Parand, Iran. Amir_mirzaie92@yahoo.com.
Reza KazempourDepartment of Biology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
Shahrzad RahimiDepartment of Biology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Setare Farokhi LarijaniDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Faranak HejabiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Kamand SedaghatniaDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Tehran South Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch · IRAmirkabir University of Technology · IRIslamic Azad University North Tehran Branch · IRIslamic Azad University of Parand · IRIslamic Azad University Roudehen Branch · IRIslamic Azad University South Tehran Branch · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, the optimized niosomal formulation containing paclitaxel using non-ionic surfactants and cholesterol was designed and its cytotoxic effects against different breast cancer cell lines and apoptosis gene expression analysis were also investigated. METHODS AND

resultsDue to enhancing equation variables, the Box-Behnken method has been applied. Lipid/drug molar ratio, the amounts of Span 60, and cholesterol were selected as the target for optimization. The particle size of niosome loaded paclitaxel and entrapment efficiency proportion have been considered in the role of dependent variables. Then the cytotoxic activity of the optimized formulation was evaluated using an MTT assay against different breast cancer cell lines including MCF-7, T-47D, SkBr3, and MDA-MB-231. The expression level of Bax and Bcl-2 apoptosis genes was determined by Real-Time PCR. In this study, the optimized niosomal formulation revealed that the synthesized niosomes had a spherical appearance and had an average size of 192.73 ± 5.50 nm so that the percentage of drug loading was 94.71 ± 1.56%. Moreover, this formulation showed a controlled and slowed release of paclitaxel at different pH (7.4, 6.5, and 5.4). The cytotoxicity results demonstrated that cell viability in all concentrations of niosome loaded paclitaxel had profound cytotoxic effects on all studied breast cancer cell lines compared to the free paclitaxel (p < 0.05). In addition, the expression of apoptosis genes was much higher than that of free paclitaxel indicating the susceptibility of cells to apoptosis.

conclusionsAs a result, niosomal formulations containing paclitaxel can be used as a new drug delivery system to increase cytotoxicity and treatment of breast cancer in the upcoming future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsApoptosisCholesterolFemaleGene ExpressionHumansLiposomesMCF-7 CellsPaclitaxelParticle SizeAntineoplastic AgentsCholesterolLiposomesPaclitaxelBreast cancerCytotoxicityNiosomeOptimizationPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID35235156
OpenAlexW4214935423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.