Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35234654›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

eDOL mHealth App and Web Platform for Self-monitoring and Medical Follow-up of Patients With Chronic Pain: Observational Feasibility Study.

Nicolas Kerckhove, Noémie Delage, Sébastien Cambier, Nathalie Cantagrel, Eric Serra, Fabienne Marcaillou, Caroline Maindet, Pascale Picard, Gaelle Martiné, Rodrigue Deleens and 25 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03931694 (Evaluation of the Feasibility of an E-health Tool in the Follow-up and Characterization of Chronic Pain Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03931694 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Feasibility of an E-health Tool in the Follow-up and Characterization of Chronic Pain Patients.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2019 to 2020Enrolled113ConditionsChronic PainArmse-DOL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Nicolas Kerckhove *Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2223-1240
Noémie Delage *Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-1911
Sébastien CambierCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-6473
Nathalie CantagrelCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-9905
Eric SerraCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, Amiens, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1921-0097
Fabienne MarcaillouCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9039-7333
Caroline MaindetCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-9785
Pascale PicardCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6052-1524
Gaelle MartinéCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4236-8095
Rodrigue DeleensCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-2657
Anne-Priscille TrouvinCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Cochin, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-7455
Lauriane FourelCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Bayeux, Bayeux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-7131
Gaelle Espagne-DubreuilhCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-8501
Ludovic DouayCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, Amiens, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-8316
Stéphane FoulonCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens, Amiens, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-0010
Bénédicte DufraisseCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0415-7163
Christian GovCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5810-1950
Eric VielCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-3246
François JedrykaCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3014-5131
Sophie PouplinCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5797-4813
Cécile LestradeCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-0436
Emmanuel CombeCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-6615
Serge PerrotCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Cochin, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0509-1592
Dominique PerocheauCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Cochin, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-7244
Valentine De BrissonCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Bayeux, Bayeux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-613X
Pascale Vergne-SalleCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0037-8540
Patrick MertensCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-261X
Bruno PereiraCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3778-7161
Abdoul Jalil Djiberou MahamadouLaboratoire d'Informatique, de Modélisation et d'Optimisation des Systèmes, Université Clermont Auvergne, Aubière, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-1911
Violaine AntoineLaboratoire d'Informatique, de Modélisation et d'Optimisation des Systèmes, Université Clermont Auvergne, Aubière, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-3505
Alice CortevalInstitut Analgesia, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-6375
Alain EschalierInstitut Analgesia, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6778-1057
Christian DualéCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2333-7357
Nadine AttalInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 987 - Centre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Ambroise Paré, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-8387
Nicolas AuthierCentre d'évaluation et de traitement de la douleur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-0383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain affects approximately 30% of the general population, severely degrades quality of life (especially in older adults) and professional life (inability or reduction in the ability to work and loss of employment), and leads to billions in additional health care costs. Moreover, available painkillers are old, with limited efficacy and can cause significant adverse effects. Thus, there is a need for innovation in the management of chronic pain. Better characterization of patients could help to identify the predictors of successful treatments, and thus, guide physicians in the initial choice of treatment and in the follow-up of their patients. Nevertheless, current assessments of patients with chronic pain provide only fragmentary data on painful daily experiences. Real-life monitoring of subjective and objective markers of chronic pain using mobile health (mHealth) programs can address this issue.

objectiveWe hypothesized that regular patient self-monitoring using an mHealth app would lead physicians to obtain deeper understanding and new insight into patients with chronic pain and that, for patients, regular self-monitoring using an mHealth app would play a positive therapeutic role and improve adherence to treatment. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a new mHealth app called eDOL.

methodsWe conducted an observational study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the eDOL tool. Patients completed several questionnaires using the tool over a period of 2 weeks and repeated assessments weekly over a period of 3 months. Physicians saw their patients at a follow-up visit that took place at least 3 months after the inclusion visit. A composite criterion of the acceptability and feasibility of the eDOL tool was calculated after the completion of study using satisfaction surveys from both patients and physicians.

resultsData from 105 patients (of 133 who were included) were analyzed. The rate of adherence was 61.9% (65/105) after 3 months. The median acceptability score was 7 (out of 10) for both patients and physicians. There was a high rate of completion of the baseline questionnaires and assessments (mean 89.3%), and a low rate of completion of the follow-up questionnaires and assessments (63.8% (67/105) and 61.9% (65/105) respectively). We were also able to characterize subgroups of patients and determine a profile of those who adhered to eDOL. We obtained 4 clusters that differ from each other in their biopsychosocial characteristics. Cluster 4 corresponds to patients with more disabling chronic pain (daily impact and comorbidities) and vice versa for cluster 1.

conclusionsThis work demonstrates that eDOL is highly feasible and acceptable for both patients with chronic pain and their physicians. It also shows that such a tool can integrate many parameters to ensure the detailed characterization of patients for future research works and pain management.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov NCT03931694; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03931694.

Indexed as

chronic paineHealthfeasibility studymHealthself-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35234654
PMCPMC8928045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.