Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35234371›Full record

SynthesisHepatology communications2022

Global and regional long-term survival following resection for HCC in the recent decade: A meta-analysis of 110 studies.

Rosyli F Reveron-Thornton, Margaret L P Teng, Eunice Yewon Lee, Andrew Tran, Sean Vajanaphanich, Eunice X Tan, Sanjna N Nerurkar, Rui Xin Ng, Readon Teh, Debi Prasad Tripathy and 10 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hepatology communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence in Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Molecular mechanisms in MASLD/MASH-related HCC.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Rosyli F Reveron-ThorntonStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA.
Margaret L P TengDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineNational University HospitalSingapore.
Eunice Yewon LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineStanford University Medical CenterPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA.
Andrew TranDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA.
Sean VajanaphanichStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA.
Eunice X TanDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineNational University HospitalSingapore.
Sanjna N NerurkarYong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingapore.
Rui Xin NgDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineNational University HospitalSingapore.
Readon TehDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineNational University HospitalSingapore.
Debi Prasad TripathyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand.
Takanori ItoDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan.
Taku TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan.
Nozomi MiyakeOkayama City HospitalOkayamaJapan.
Biyao ZouDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineStanford University Medical CenterPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA.
Connie WongLane Medical LibraryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA.
Hidenori ToyodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyOgaki Municipal HospitalOgaki, GifuJapan.
Carlos O EsquivelDivision of Abdominal TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA.
C Andrew BonhamDivision of Abdominal TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA.
Mindie H NguyenDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineStanford University Medical CenterPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA.ORCID 0000-0002-6275-4989
Daniel Q HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineNational University HospitalSingapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection for HCC remains a major curative treatment option, but it is unclear whether there are differences in outcomes by region and whether outcomes have improved over time. We aimed to estimate pooled overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complication rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following curative surgical resection and to compare outcomes by region and by time period. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to May 15, 2020. We selected studies reporting OS, RFS, and complications in adult patients with HCC undergoing curative surgical resection. Two authors independently searched the literature and extracted the data. We screened 6983 articles and included 110 eligible studies with 82,392 patients, with study periods spanning from 1980-2017. The global pooled 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.1-90.4) and 56.2% (95% CI 52.8-59.6) for OS and 71.1% (95% CI 67.6-74.3) and 35.2% (95% CI 32.5-38.0) for RFS, respectively. Five-year OS was higher in Asia (57.03%) than in other regions (Europe 48.3%; North America 48.0%; and South America 49.5%); p = 0.002. Five-year RFS was higher in patients with hepatitis B virus versus patients with hepatitis C virus (34.8% vs. 24.1%; p = 0.02). There was no significant improvement in 5-year OS and RFS over time. The pooled rate for complications was 27.6% (95% CI 23.4-32.3), with 9.7% (95% CI 6.3-14.7) classified as major. One-year OS after surgical resection for HCC is excellent (~90%). However, 5-year OS (~55%) and RFS (~35%) are still poor, suggesting that long-term care is suboptimal. Greater efforts are required to improve survival through enhanced surveillance and preventing recurrence through antiviral therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsAdultHepatitis BHepatitis CHumansSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35234371
PMCPMC9234624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.