Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35234320›Full record

ReviewNursing in critical care2022

Family-centred care change during COVID-19.

Siriporn Vetcho, Marie Cooke, Helen Petsky, Amornrat Saito, Amanda J Ullman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Family-centred care change during COVID-19.Nursing in critical care · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siriporn VetchoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane.ORCID 0000-0002-0064-6616
Marie CookeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-4685
Helen PetskySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-9002
Amornrat SaitoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane.ORCID 0000-0002-9290-719X
Amanda J UllmanSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane.ORCID 0000-0001-8860-5319

Funding

HDR Financial Support, Griffith Health Group Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily-centred care (FCC) is an approach to promote family and health care provider partnership. This has been incorporated into neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide. However, FCC in low resource health settings, such as Thailand, is challenging and further impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

aimsTo evaluate FCC innovations to improve respect, collaboration and support in a Thai NICU. STUDY

designA quasi-experimental study was conducted in an NICU in southern Thailand. Pre-implementation was prior to COVID-19, and parental and staff perceptions of FCC were measured via Perceptions of Family Centred Care-Parent (PFCC-P) and -Staff (PFCC-S) survey. The FCC innovations were developed by stakeholders based on the COVID-19 restrictions, pre-survey results, parents' and clinicians' interviews and integrative review, then implemented via a flowchart. Post-implementation evaluation was via repeated surveys. Comparisons were made pre-and post-implementation, with Mann-Whitney U-test statistics for parents and Wilcoxon's Rank Sum for staff.

resultsA total of 185 (85 pre; 100 post) parents and 20 (pre and post; paired group) health care professionals participated. Because of COVID-19, many planned interventions were unfeasible, however, other innovations achieved (e.g., structured telephone updates, information booklet revision). There was an increase in parents' perception of respect ([median] 2.50-3.50), collaboration (2.33-3.33) and support (2.60-3.60) domains and overall (2.50-3.43; p < .001; 95% CI: 2.93-3.11). Interdisciplinary professionals' perception of FCC did not significantly change pre-and post-implementation/COVID-19 pandemic for respect (3.00-2.92), collaboration (3.22-3.33), support (3.20-3.20) and overall (3.15-3.20; 95% CI: 3.10-3.25).

conclusionDespite the challenges of COVID-19 restricting NICU access, the provision of FCC was maintained and even improved. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Further research is necessary to develop FCC practice innovations associated with communication, across diverse health care systems and resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19CommunicationHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPandemicsParentsfamily-centred careinterdisciplinary professionalsneonatal intensive care unitparentsThailand

Identifiers

PMID35234320
PMCPMC9115396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.