ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2022
Analysis of risk factors for re-displacement of pediatric tibia fractures: A retrospective study of 196 cases.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aims of this study were (1) to analyze the factors that may cause loss of reduction (LOR) in pediatric tibia diaphysis and distal third fractures treated with closed reduction and casting (CRC) and (2) to determine the effectiveness of cast index (CI), gap index (GI), and three-point index (TPI) in prediction of LOR.
methodsThe patients aged 0-16 years who were admitted to the emergency department between January 2014 and January 2018, with tibia diaphysis or distal third fractures and treated with CRC were included the study. A total of 196 pediatric patients (41 females, 155 males) were retrospectively evaluated. The radiographs on admission were analyzed in terms of fracture type, location of the fracture, presence/location of the fibula fracture as well as initial angulation in both planes, translation, and the time of definitive cast. On radiographs taken after closed reduction and final casting, angulation in the coronal and sagittal planes, amount of translation (%), CI, GI, and TPI were measured. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors of re-displacement.
resultsOf 196 patients, 46 developed re-displacement (23%). Age (P : 0.029), initial translation (P : 0.006), post-reduction translation (P : 0.001), and post-reduction AP angulation (P : 0.002) were found statistically significant. Mean CI and GI were higher in re-displacement group (P : 0.033, 0.036, respectively). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis postreduction AP angulation, post-reduction translation, and cast index were found independent risk factors.
conclusionOne should carefully evaluate patients who underwent CRC due to tibia fracture with CI > 1.02, post-reduction AP angulation > 3.4°, and post-reduction translation > 24.3° in terms of occurrence of re-displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.