Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2022
Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes (ARMMS-T2D): Study rationale, design, and methods.
Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Social Vulnerability on Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery Versus Medical and Lifestyle Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of the ARMMS-T2D Consortium of Randomized Trials.Annals of internal medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes in the Bypass Equipoise Sleeve Trial (BEST) compared to general metabolic bariatric practice in Sweden.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of metabolic surgery versus medical/lifestyle therapy on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2024Article
- Article
- Insight into continuous glucose monitoring: from medical basics to commercialized devices.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsLong-term data from randomized clinical trials comparing metabolic (bariatric) surgery versus a medical/lifestyle intervention for treatment of patients with obesity/overweight and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are lacking. The Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes (ARMMS-T2D) is a consortium of four randomized trials designed to compare long-term efficacy and safety of surgery versus medical/lifestyle therapy on diabetes control and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with T2D and body mass index (BMI) of 27-45 kg/m
resultsIn total, 302 patients (192 surgical, 110 medical/lifestyle) previously randomized in the four parent studies were eligible for participation in the ARMMS-T2D observational study. Participant demographics were 71% white, 27% African-American and 68% female. At baseline: age, 50 ± 8 years; BMI, 36.5 ± 3.5 kg/m
conclusionsARMMS-T2D will provide the largest body of long-term, level 1 evidence to inform clinical decision-making regarding the comparative durability, efficacy and safety of metabolic surgery relative to a medical/lifestyle intervention among patients with T2D, including those with milder class I obesity or mere overweight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.