ArticleAndrologia2022
Effects of leukocytospermia on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology.
Article in Andrologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Leukocytospermia in the Management of Male Infertility: Decoding a Mystery for the Busy Clinicians.The world journal of men's health · 2025Review
- Leukocytospermia and/or Bacteriospermia: Impact on Male Infertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Leukocytospermia does not negatively impact outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: findings from 5435 cycles.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Male Infertility Coexists with Decreased Sperm Genomic Integrity and Oxidative Stress in Semen Irrespective of Leukocytospermia.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Asymptomatic Leukocytospermia and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: Reason for concern?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukocytospermia is one of the common causes of male infertility, and its effects on the clinical outcomes of assisted reproduction are controversial. There are no recommendations for the management of leukocytospermia in cases of assisted reproductive technology (ART). To investigate the impact of leukocytospermia on ART, we retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes in ART couples with or without leukocytospermia and further analysed the impact of the insemination method itself by split insemination treatment in ART couples with leukocytospermia. In this study, leukocytospermia was detected in 133 patients, namely 63 in the conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) group, 38 in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) group and 32 in the split insemination group. Leukocytospermia has a negative influence on the parameters of semen samples; however, leukocytospermia did not affect the clinical outcomes of IVF or ICSI. Different insemination methods did not affect the fertilization, clinical pregnancy or live birth rates. In the split insemination study, no significant differences in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between the IVF and ICSI groups were found; however, the numbers of two pronuclei (2PN), available embryos and good-quality embryos in the ICSI group were higher than those in the IVF group. Leukocytospermia may be a risk factor affecting semen parameters, and more attention should be given to IVF insemination. Leukocytospermia has no significant negative effect on the outcomes of ART. ICSI may obtain better embryos than IVF, but it cannot improve the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.