Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233754›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Patient Educators.

Karen Lawrie, Eleni Giannopoulos, Tina Papadakos, Faith Addiss, Sarah Christensen, Louise Cunningham, Jackie Foster, Liliana Mulato, Renee Siegel, Clare Sullivan and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen LawrieCancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eleni GiannopoulosCancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tina PapadakosCancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faith AddissRoswell Park Cancer Center, Patient Education, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sarah ChristensenPatient Education Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Louise CunninghamNational Cancer Institute Headquarters, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jackie FosterNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Patient Services, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Liliana MulatoHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Renee SiegelDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Clare SullivanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jila TanhaPatient Education Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Janet PapadakosCancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Janet.Papadakos@uhnresearch.ca.
Cancer Care Ontario · CADana-Farber Cancer Institute · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Marrow Donor Program · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient education (PE) is vital in reducing anxiety, increasing satisfaction with treatment, helping with self-management, and creating a sense of control for cancer patients. Patients access much of their material from health care providers through in-person visits, patient libraries, and in-person classes. Due to reductions in in-person visits throughout the pandemic, we sought to understand how PE programs responded under varying levels of COVID-19 restrictions to meet the information needs of patients and families. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to members of the Cancer Patient Education Network (CPEN) and the Health Care Education Association (HCEA) via the respective listservs. The survey consisted of five sections that included closed and opened questions. Participants were asked questions to describe their PE programs and how their duties were affected during the pandemic. Forty-two CPEN members completed the survey (N = 42, 66%) with a 35% response rate and a 55% completion rate, and 19 HCEA members completed the survey (N = 19, 30%) with a 5% response rate and 16% completion rate. The majority of staff surveyed were not furloughed (N = 57/64, 89%). Just under half reported a change in daily PE program activities (N = 23/52, 44%) and most reported a change in developing PE materials (e.g., pamphlets) (N = 10/26, 63%), finding information for patients/families (N = 11/19, 58%), and delivering classes (N = 12/21, 57%). COVID-19 has ushered in a new era in the delivery of PE with the rapid deployment of digital cancer patient education. Results can inform future directions for the delivery of PE post-pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCoronavirusCOVID-19PandemicPatient educationPatient educators

Identifiers

PMID35233754
PMCPMC8888025
OpenAlexW4214840141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.