Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233658›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

National recurrence of pancreatitis and readmissions after biliary pancreatitis.

Arturo J Rios-Diaz, Ryan Lamm, David Metcalfe, Courtney L Devin, Michael J Pucci, Francesco Palazzo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arturo J Rios-DiazDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Arturo.RiosDiaz@jefferson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-1920
Ryan LammDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
David MetcalfeRheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Courtney L DevinDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Michael J PucciDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Francesco PalazzoDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational and international guidelines support early cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis but a recent nationwide study suggested these recommendations are not universally followed. Our study sought to quantify the national utilization of same hospitalization cholecystectomy versus non-operative management (NOM) and its association with pancreatitis recurrence, readmissions, and costs after mild gallstone pancreatitis (GP).

methodsAdult patients admitted with mild GP were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2010-2015. Primary outcomes included the rate of cholecystectomy during the index admission as well as pancreatitis recurrence and readmission at 30 and 180 days (30d, 180d) comparing NOM to same hospitalization cholecystectomy. Mortality upon readmission, total length of stay (LOS), and total costs (combined index-readmission hospital costs) were also explored. Cox proportional hazards regression and generalized linear models controlled for patient/hospital confounders.

resultsAmong the 65,067 patients identified, 30% underwent cholecystectomy. The NOM cohort was older (58 vs. 50 years), had more comorbidities (Charlson index > 2, 23.5% vs. 11.5%), fewer female patients (56.7% vs. 67%) and less discharge-to-home (84.9% vs. 94.4%) (all p < 0.001). NOM was associated with increase in recurrence and unplanned readmissions at 30d [Hazard Ratio 3.53 (95% CI 2.92-4.27), 2.41 (2.11-2.74), respectively], and 180d [4.27 (3.65-4.98), 2.78 (2.54-3.04), respectively], as well as increased mortality during 180d readmission 1.88 (1.06-3.35). This approach was also associated with significant increase in LOS [predicted mean difference 2.79 days (95% CI 2.46-3.12)] and total costs [$2507.89 ($1714.4-$3301.4)].

conclusionsIn the USA, most patients presenting with mild GP do not undergo same hospitalization cholecystectomy. This strategy results in higher recurrent pancreatitis, mortality during readmission, and an additional $4.85 M/year in hospital costs nationwide. These data support same hospitalization cholecystectomy as the gold standard for mild GP.

Indexed as

GallstonesPancreatitisAdultCholecystectomyFemaleHumansLength of StayPatient ReadmissionRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesCholecystectomyGallstone pancreatitisHealthcare utilizationHospital costsNationwideReadmissionRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID35233658
OpenAlexW4214894245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.