Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233573›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2022

Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from humans to pets in Washington and Idaho: burden and risk factors.

Julianne Meisner, Timothy V Baszler, Kathryn H Kuehl, Vickie Ramirez, Anna Baines, Lauren A Frisbie, Eric T Lofgren, David M DeAvila, Rebecca M Wolking, Dan S Bradway and 4 more

Abstract readPreprint
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Julianne MeisnerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Timothy V BaszlerWashington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Kathryn H KuehlDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Vickie RamirezUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna BainesUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lauren A FrisbieWashington State Department of Health, Tumwater, WA, USA.
Eric T LofgrenPaul G. Allen School for Global Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
David M DeAvilaWashington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Rebecca M WolkingWashington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Dan S BradwayWashington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Hannah WilsonWashington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Beth LiptonPublic Health - Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vance KawakamiPublic Health - Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peter M RabinowitzUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

University of Washington Arboviral Research Network (UWARN)U01AI151698 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Michael Gale, PETER MACGARR RABINOWITZ · 2020 to 2026
$13.3M
FDA Vet-LIRN Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory ProgramU18FD006180 · FDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Kevin Roy Snekvik · 2017 to 2026
$660k
FDA HHS U18 FD006180NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201700059CNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI151698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is believed to have emerged from an animal reservoir; however, the frequency of and risk factors for inter-species transmission remain unclear. We carried out a community-based study of pets in households with one or more confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Among 119 dogs and 57 cats with completed surveys, clinical signs consistent with SARS-CoV-2 were reported in 20 dogs (21%) and 19 cats (39%). Out of 81 dogs and 32 cats sampled for testing, 40% of dogs and 43% of cats were seropositive, and 5% of dogs and 8% of cats were PCR positive; this discordance may be due to delays in sampling. Respondents commonly reported close human-animal contact and willingness to take measures to prevent transmission to their pets. Reported preventative measures showed a slightly protective trend for both illness and seropositivity in pets, while sharing of beds and bowls had slight harmful effects.

Identifiers

PMID35233573
PMCPMC8887074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.