Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233528›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2021

Adverse clinical outcomes associated with infections by Enterobacterales producing ESBL (ESBL-E): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weiping Ling, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Yukiko Ezure, Patrick N A Harris, David L Paterson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surveillance of CTX-M group 1-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Epidemiology and risk factors ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. A 46-week outbreak of ertapenem-resistant, non-carbapenemase encodingEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Evaluation of extended-spectrumFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weiping LingFaculty of Medicine, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-3831
Luis Furuya-KanamoriFaculty of Medicine, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.
Yukiko EzureFaculty of Medicine, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.
Patrick N A HarrisFaculty of Medicine, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2895-0345
David L PatersonFaculty of Medicine, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2079-4437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEnterobacterales producing ESBL (ESBL-E) have been notable for their rapid expansion in community settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize evidence investigating the association between ESBL-E infection and adverse clinical outcomes, defined as bacteraemia, sepsis or septic shock, and all-cause mortality in adult patients.

methodsDatabase search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE. In general, studies were screened for effect estimates of ESBL-E colonization or infection on clinical outcomes with non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales as comparator, adult populations and molecular ascertainment of ESBL gene. Meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance heterogeneity model.

resultsEighteen studies were identified, including 1399 ESBL-E and 3200 non-ESBL-E infected patients. Sixteen of these studies included only bacteraemic patients. Mortality was studied in 17 studies and ESBL-E infection was significantly associated with higher odds of mortality compared with non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales infection (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.15-2.49,

conclusionsInfections by ESBL-E appear to be significantly associated with mortality but not septic shock. Available studies investigating bacteraemia and shock as an intermediate outcome of ESBL-E infections are lacking. Future studies investigating the relationship between clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics of resistant strains are further warranted, along with studies investigating this in non-bacteraemic patients.

Identifiers

PMID35233528
PMCPMC8210200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.