Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233508›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2022

Immunochemotherapy and Maintenance With Obinutuzumab or Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Marginal Zone Lymphoma in the Randomized GALLIUM Trial.

Michael Herold, Eva Hoster, Ann Janssens, Helen McCarthy, Alessandra Tedeschi, Chris Pocock, Andras Rosta, Marek Trněný, Tina G Nielsen, Andrea Knapp and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01332968 (A Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Evaluating the Benefit of GA101), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01332968 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Evaluating the Benefit of GA101 (RO5072759) Plus Chemotherapy Compared With Rituximab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by GA101 or Rituximab Maintenance Therapy in Responders

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2021Enrolled1,401ConditionsNon-Hodgkin's LymphomaArmsObinutuzumab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [The guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma in China (2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Atrial fibrillation following bendamustine in three lymphoma patients.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Marginal zone lymphoma with severe rashes: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Management of marginal zone lymphomas.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Michael HeroldHelios Klinikum Erfurt, Germany.
Eva HosterDepartment of Medicine III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Germany.
Ann JanssensDepartment of Hematology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Belgium.
Helen McCarthyDepartment of Haematology, Royal Bournemouth General Hospital, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
Alessandra TedeschiDepartment of Hematology, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Chris PocockEast Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Andras RostaDepartment of Haematology, Országos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Marek Trněný1 Faculty of Medicine, Charles University General Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tina G NielsenF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea KnappF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Wolfgang HiddemannDepartment of Medicine III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Germany.
Robert MarcusHCA Healthcare, London, United Kingdom.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERoche (Switzerland) · CHAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITCharles University · CZEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GBHelios Klinikum Erfurt · DEInforma Healthcare · GBNational Institute of Criminology · HURoyal Bournemouth Hospital · GBUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab (G)- versus rituximab (R)-chemotherapy in a subgroup of patients with previously untreated marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) in the phase III GALLIUM trial (NCT01332968). Patients had stage III/IV (or stage II with bulky disease), splenic, nodal, or extranodal MZL requiring treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive G- or R-chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone; or bendamustine, allocated at patient level). Patients with complete/partial response at the end of induction (EOI) received G/R maintenance. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), other time-to-event endpoints, response, and safety were assessed. Overall, 195 patients with MZL were included in this analysis: G-chemotherapy (n = 99), R-chemotherapy (n = 96). Median observation time: 59.3 months. No meaningful difference was observed between arms for PFS (4-y PFS rates: G-chemotherapy, 72.6%; R-chemotherapy, 64.1%), other time-to-event endpoints, or EOI response rates (by computed tomography [CT; G-chemotherapy, 81.8%; R-chemotherapy, 81.3%] and positron emission tomography CT [G-chemotherapy, 79.2%; R-chemotherapy, 87.5%]). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). G-chemotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-5 (86.1% versus 77.4%), grade 5 (14.9% versus 9.7%), and serious (66.3% versus 51.6%) AEs versus R-chemotherapy. Both arms had a higher incidence of grade 3-5 and serious AEs than patients with follicular lymphoma (GALLIUM), with G-chemotherapy being less tolerable than R-chemotherapy. Based on the observed tolerability of G-chemotherapy versus R-chemotherapy, and the comparable efficacy of G-chemotherapy and R-chemotherapy in this analysis, G-chemotherapy cannot be recommended as first-line treatment for MZL.

Identifiers

PMID35233508
PMCPMC8878871
OpenAlexW4213426150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.