ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
The acceptance level of Hospital Information Management System (HIMS) among the nursing officials working in a teaching hospital.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe acceptability of hospital staff in the use of hospital information management system (HIMS) is an emerging research area it can explain the fate of any HIMS development and implementation project in hospitals. The aim of this study was to observe the level of acceptance of HMIS among nursing officials working at a teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted for 1 year in a teaching hospital of northern India by using a pretested questionnaire. Our study participants were nursing officers who were not under the probation period and we used a purposive sampling (10% nurses from each ward). Our sample size was 256.
resultsWe have observed that majority of 174 (67.96%) participants had good acceptability to the HIMS system. Our study revealed that most of the participants were aware of HIMS. Among all participants, nearly half of them had good acceptability to the HIMS system. This is may be due to their job profiles, distribution of their working places, and their past experiences with HMIS. The bottlenecks such as connectivity problem, error prevention, and lack of training can be addressed by the hospital management by proper measures.
conclusionThe acceptance level of HIMS among the nursing officials working in a teaching hospital was good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.