Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233368›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational hepatology2022

Comparing the Diagnostic Criteria of MAFLD and NAFLD in the Chinese Population: A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study.

Cheng Yu, Minzhen Wang, Shan Zheng, Miao Xia, Hongyan Yang, Desheng Zhang, Chun Yin, Ning Cheng, Yana Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. MAFLD: How is it different from NAFLD?Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cheng YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Minzhen WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-3949
Shan ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Miao XiaDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Hongyan YangDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Desheng ZhangWorkers' Hospital of Jinchuan Group Co, Ltd, Jinchang, Gansu, China.
Chun YinWorkers' Hospital of Jinchuan Group Co, Ltd, Jinchang, Gansu, China.
Ning ChengCentre of Medical Laboratory, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yana BaiDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-1723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMetabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a new concept, proposed in 2020; however, its applicability in Asia populations has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, we aimed to compare the difference in epidemiological and clinical characteristics between MAFLD and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) among Asian populations.

methodsBased on the Jinchang cohort, 30,633 participants were collected. The prevalence and incidence of MAFLD and NAFLD were used to analyze the epidemic characteristics and its overlapping effects. In addition, the corresponding clinical characteristics of the two diagnostic criteria populations were compared.

resultsThe prevalence rates of MAFLD and NAFLD were 21.03% and 18.83%, respectively. After an average 2.28-year follow-up, the incidence densities of MAFLD and NAFLD were 41.58 per 1,000 person-years and 37.69 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. With the increase of baseline age, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC) levels, the prevalence and incidence of MAFLD and NAFLD were on the rise (all

conclusionsCompared with NAFLD, the newly proposed definition of MAFLD is more practical and accurate, and it can help identify more fatty liver patients with high-risk diseases.

Indexed as

ApplicabilityDiagnostic criteriaMAFLDNAFLDProspective cohort study

Identifiers

PMID35233368
PMCPMC8845147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.