Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35233339›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Successful Treatment Outcomes for Partial Thickness Burns by Innovative Bovine Peritoneum Dressing.

Berik E Tuleubayev, Baurzhan B Anapiya, Yerkin-Dauir T Kurmangaliyev, Kabylbek R Abugaliyev

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. AnFrontiers in surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Berik E TuleubayevSurgery Diseases Department, NC JSC Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.
Baurzhan B AnapiyaNC JSC Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.
Yerkin-Dauir T KurmangaliyevPUC Multidisciplinary Hospital of H.J. Makazhanov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan.
Kabylbek R AbugaliyevMultidisciplinary Surgery Department, National Research Oncology Center LLP, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Karaganda Medical University · KZNational Research Center for Maternal and Child Health · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the world practice of treating burns, acellular matrices have been used for quite a long time. However, the budget for treating one burn patient in Kazakhstan does not exceed $1000. This amount does not cover the costs for procurement of foreign-made xenograft dressings. Because the cattle breeding sector is very well-developed in the country, a domestic xenograft is produced by decellularization and sterilization of the cattle peritoneum, which costs only $10. This case report outlines how we used this matrix in a patient with partial thickness burns. A 45-year-old woman was admitted to the burn department with second stage burns on her back and right shoulder. The burn area comprised 10%, according to the Lund Browder chart. Once formal consent was obtained from the patient, an occlusive dressing was applied from the decellularized cattle peritoneum. Good adhesion of the dressing to the wound bed was noted. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the tenth day. It took 23 days to reach complete epithelialization. No adverse effects were noted. We believe that further studies conducted by our research team will allow this innovative, low-cost, easy-to-apply biologic dressing to be widely used in the therapeutic treatment of burns.

Identifiers

PMID35233339
PMCPMC8878626
OpenAlexW4214627896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.